Redesign of a 60,000 DWT Dry Bulk Jetty from Precast to Cast-In-Situ System in a Seismic Port Area: Structural Design and Cost Implication.

Kohar Yudoprasetyo; Gandhi Kesuma; Raden Buyung Anugraha Affandhie

doi:10.31004/riggs.v5i1.6551

Authors

Kohar Yudoprasetyo Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Gandhi Kesuma Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Raden Buyung Anugraha Affandhie Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i1.6551

Keywords:

Dry Bulk Jetty, Cast-In-Situ Redesign, Seismic Jetty, Marine Structure, Soft Soil, SAP2000, Steel Pipe Pile, Berthing and Mooring Loads, Cost Implication

Abstract

This study presents the redesign and structural verification of a 60,000 DWT dry bulk jetty in the coastal area of Gresik, East Java, where the project site is characterized by soft ground (Site Class SE) and requires earthquake-resistant performance. The original structural concept is reconfigured from a precast system to a cast-in-situ reinforced concrete system to improve continuity, connection robustness, and constructability in a seismic port environment. A three-dimensional numerical model was developed in SAP2000 to represent the interaction between deck slab, beams, pile caps, and steel pipe piles (SPP Ø1016 mm, t = 15.9 mm). Design actions include dead and operational live loads (3.0 t/m²), crane wheel loads under critical transverse positions, vessel berthing and mooring loads (fender reaction and bollard demand), and response-spectrum earthquake loading based on Indonesian provisions. The redesigned superstructure adopts a 350 mm deck slab with D16–150 reinforcement, and beam detailing is provided for longitudinal, transverse, and crane beams. Foundation checks confirm that axial reactions remain below the pile bearing capacity, pile utilization ratios are below unity, maximum vertical settlement is 0.63 cm (within the allowable limit), and maximum lateral deflection is 85.14 mm (below the serviceability threshold). The lump-sum construction cost implication for the redesigned system is USD 11.062 million.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Al-Hammadi and A. Diabat, “An integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem for bulk ports: Formulation and case study,” RAIRO-Oper. Res., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 267–284, 2017.

A. Pabón-Noguera, M. G. Carrasco-García, J. J. Ruíz-Aguilar, M. I. Rodríguez-García, M. Cerbán-Jimenez, and I. J. Domínguez, “Multicriteria Decision Model for Port Evaluation and Ranking: An Analysis of Container Terminals in Latin America and the Caribbean Using PCA-TOPSIS Methodologies,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 14. p. 6174, 2024.

R. Alsultani, A. Rwayyih Hasan, and A. Al-Yasir, “Joint hazard fragility analysis of pile foundation bridge piers in coastal soft soil areas subjected to water waves and earthquake actions,” ISH J. Hydraul. Eng., pp. 1–27, Sep. 2025.

E. Hafudiansyah and G. R. Prima, “Analisa Struktur Dermaga Cargo Dengan Kapasitas Kapal 50.000 GT (Studi Kasus: Pelabuhan Kolaka Sulawesi Tenggara),” Akselerasi J. Ilm. Tek. Sipil, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2020.

D. Yanti, I. Gunawan, and E. S. Hisyam, “Perencanaan struktur dermaga pelabuhan tanjung gudang belinyu kabupaten bangka,” J. Fropil, vol. 6, pp. 1–13, 2018.

H. Huang, M. Li, Y. Yuan, and H. Bai, “Experimental Research on the Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Frame with Replaceable Artificial Controllable Plastic Hinges,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 149, Jan. 2023.

Z. Wang, G. Xing, J. Huang, Z. Chang, and D. Luo, “Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Exterior Beam-Column Joint with Disc Spring Devices,” J. Earthq. Eng., vol. 28, pp. 1–28, Jul. 2024.

J. B. Supandjono, K. Hasan, H. Panggabean, D. Satria, and Sukardi, “Peta Geologi Lembar Surabaya & Sapulu, Jawa,” Geological Map of the Surabaya & Sapulu Quadrangle, Jawa. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geologi (Geological Research and Development Centre), Bandung, Indonesia, 1992.

M. Irmawan, K. Yudoprasetyo, A. N. Refani, K. Indrasurya, and D. N. Parwita, “The Evaluation of Pipeline Protection Influenced by Causeway Embankment Using the Finite Element Method (FEM),” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 11. 22-Jun-2024.

Badan Standarisasi Nasional, SNI 2847:2019 Persyaratan beton struktural untuk bangunan gedung dan penjelasan. Jakarta: Badan Standarisasi Nasional, 2019.

American Concrete Institute, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (ACI 318M-19). Farmington Hills, MI: Farmington Hills, MI : American Concrete Institute, [2019] ©2019, 2019.

ASTM International, ASTM A252 - Standard Specification for Welded and Seamless Steel Pipe Piles. 2019.

I. Computers & Structures, CSI Analysis Reference Manual For SAP2000, ETABS, SAFE, and CSiBridge. California, 2025.

K. Yudoprasetyo et al., “Upaya Penguatan Keselamatan Prasarana Sekolah melalui Evaluasi Teknis Struktur Kolom pada Bangunan Pendidikan di Bojonegoro,” Inov. J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 3, no. 3 SE-Artikel, pp. 255–266, Jan. 2026.

D. He, Y. Cheng, H. Liu, and H. Lin, “Pile–Soil Interaction and Group Pile Effect in Composite Foundation Under Different Pile Length Conditions,” Buildings, vol. 15, no. 8. p. 1248, 2025.

The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan, Technical Standards and Commentaries of Port and Harbour Facilities in Japan. Tokyo: The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan, 2009.

Port of Long Beach (POLB), Wharf Design Criteria, Version 5.0. California: Port of Long Beach: Long Beach, 2021.

Badan Standarisasi Nasional, SNI 1725:2016 Pembebanan untuk jembatan. Jakarta: Badan Standarisasi Nasional, 2016.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional Indonesia, “SNI 2833-2016. Perencanaan Jembatan Terhadap Beban Gempa.” BSN, Jakarta, 2016.

Konecranes, “Konecranes Gottwald Portal Harbor Cranes,” Hyvinkää, 2015.

PIANC, Pianc fender guidelines 2024. Brussels: PIANC, 2024.

X. Xu, X. Di, Y. Zheng, A. Liu, C. Hou, and X. Lan, “Dynamic Response Characteristics and Pile Damage Identification of High-Piled Wharves under Dynamic Loading,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 20. p. 9250, 2024.

M. Chen et al., “Study on Mooring Design of 15 MW Floating Wind Turbines in South China Sea,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 1. p. 33, 2024.

J. Guo, M. Liu, Z. Fang, L. Xiao, W. Chen, and X. Pan, “Motion and Mooring Load Responses of a Novel 12-MW Semi-Submersible Floating Wind Turbine: An Experimental Study,” J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., vol. 146, pp. 1–26, May 2024.

G. Benassai, A. Campanile, V. Piscopo, and A. Scamardella, “Optimization of Mooring Systems for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines,” Coast. Eng. J., vol. 57, Nov. 2015.

S. S. Sáenz, G. Diaz-Hernandez, L. Schweter, and P. Nordbeck, “Analysis of the Mooring Effects of Future Ultra-Large Container Vessels (ULCV) on Port Infrastructures,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4. p. 856, 2023.

J. Huang et al., “Analysis of mooring performance and layout parameters of multi-segment mooring system for a 15 MW floating wind turbine,” Front. Energy Res., vol. Volume 12-2024, 2024.

Badan Standarisasi Nasional, SNI 8460:2017 Persyaratan perancangan geoteknik. Jakarta, 2017.

British Standards Institution, BS 6349-2:2010 Code of Practice for the Design of Quay Walls, Jetties, and Dolphins,. London: British Standards Institution, 2010.