Model ADKAR dalam Implementasi Manajemen Perubahan Organisasi: Analisis Konseptual melalui Literature Review Naratif

Authors

  • Jatnika Eka Patra Nusa Putra University
  • Citra Dwiyanti Ridwan Nusa Putra University
  • Dana Budiman Nusa Putra University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.5866

Keywords:

ADKAR, Manajemen Perubahan, Perubahan Organisasi, Literature Review Naratif

Abstract

Kegagalan implementasi manajemen perubahan organisasi masih menjadi isu yang banyak dibahas dalam literatur manajemen kontemporer. Berbagai studi menunjukkan bahwa hambatan utama perubahan tidak semata-mata terletak pada kelemahan strategi, tetapi pada rendahnya kesiapan individu sebagai pelaku perubahan. Model ADKAR dikembangkan sebagai kerangka manajemen perubahan yang berfokus pada individu melalui lima tahapan perubahan, yaitu Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, dan Reinforcement. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara konseptual peran dan posisi model ADKAR dalam implementasi manajemen perubahan organisasi melalui pendekatan literature review naratif. Penelusuran literatur dilakukan terhadap publikasi ilmiah bereputasi dalam lima tahun terakhir (2020–2025) yang membahas manajemen perubahan organisasi dan pendekatan perubahan berbasis individu. Literatur yang terpilih dianalisis dan disintesiskan secara kualitatif untuk mengidentifikasi kontribusi, kekuatan, serta keterbatasan model ADKAR. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa ADKAR efektif dalam mendukung adopsi perubahan pada level individu, khususnya dalam konteks perubahan operasional dan transformasi digital, serta berperan dalam mengurangi resistensi dan meningkatkan keterlibatan individu dalam proses perubahan. Namun demikian, model ADKAR memiliki keterbatasan apabila digunakan sebagai satu-satunya kerangka perubahan organisasi karena kurang mengakomodasi aspek kepemimpinan strategis, struktur, dan budaya organisasi. Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa ADKAR lebih tepat diposisikan sebagai kerangka mikro yang melengkapi pendekatan manajemen perubahan organisasi yang bersifat makro.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2021). Integrating the organizational change literature: A model for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(2), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-03-2020-0072

Anderson, D., & Anderson, L. A. (2020). Beyond change management: How to achieve breakthrough results through conscious change leadership. Organization Development Journal, 38(2), 45–58.

Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2020). Crafting change messages to create transformational readiness. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100708

Burnes, B. (2020). The origins of Lewin’s three-step model of change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319892685

Burnes, B. (2021). The problems of change management. Journal of Change Management, 21(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2020.1862788

By, R. T., Hughes, M., & Ford, J. (2020). Change leadership: Oxymoron and myths. Journal of Change Management, 20(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2019.1629975

Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2020). Individual readiness for change: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 20(2), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2019.1627564

Errida, A., & Lotfi, B. (2021). The determinants of organizational change management success. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(4), 726–743. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2020-0181

Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community. Prosci Learning Center Publications.

Hornstein, H. A. (2022). The integration of change management and leadership. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2021-0056

Kane, G. C., Phillips, A. N., Copulsky, J., & Andrus, G. (2020). How digital leadership is driving digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61(2), 1–9.

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.

McLean, G. N., & McLean, L. D. (2021). Organization development: Principles, processes, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21423

Nguyen, T. N., & Mohamed, S. (2020). Leadership behaviors and change outcomes in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 38(7), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.05.003

Oreg, S., Bartunek, J. M., Lee, G., & Do, B. (2021). An affect-based model of recipients’ responses to organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0329

Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2019). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 45(1), 167–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317749174

Stouten, J., Rousseau, D. M., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Successful organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886317702605

Vakola, M. (2021). A multilevel study of readiness to change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(5), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2505

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., et al. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/14466

Weiner, B. J. (2020). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-00989-1

Downloads

Published

25-01-2026

How to Cite

[1]
J. E. Patra, C. D. Ridwan, and D. Budiman, “Model ADKAR dalam Implementasi Manajemen Perubahan Organisasi: Analisis Konseptual melalui Literature Review Naratif”, RIGGS, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 13741–13748, Jan. 2026.

Most read articles by the same author(s)