Ecosystem of Social Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries: A Bibliometric and Network Analysis

Loso Judijanto

doi:10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3828

Authors

Loso Judijanto IPOSS Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3828

Keywords:

Social Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Social Innovation, Sustainable Development, Bibliometric Analysis, Developing Countries, Vosviewer, Network Mapping

Abstract

This study analyzes the worldwide intellectual framework of research on social entrepreneurship ecosystems in developing nations through a comprehensive bibliometric and network analysis of Scopus-indexed publications. By employing VOSviewer, the study systematically maps co-occurrence patterns, co-authorship structures, and cross-country collaboration networks to identify the principal research themes, influential authors, and collaborative dynamics that shape this scholarly domain. The results reveal that “social entrepreneurship” functions as the core thematic cluster, strongly interconnected with concepts such as social innovation, sustainable development, inclusive growth, and entrepreneurial ecosystems. These associations demonstrate how social entrepreneurship in developing countries is increasingly positioned as a multidimensional catalyst for socio-economic transformation. The network visualizations further highlight strong linkages between innovation-oriented studies and sustainability-driven research streams, underscoring the systemic and interdependent characteristics of social entrepreneurship. These connections suggest that researchers increasingly view entrepreneurial initiatives not only as economic activities but also as mechanisms for addressing societal challenges, empowering communities, and strengthening local resilience. Country-level analysis indicates that the United States and the United Kingdom remain predominant contributors, yet there is a notable surge in scholarly output from emerging economies across Asia, Africa, and Latin America, reflecting growing academic interest and practical relevance in these regions. Research deepens theoretical understanding of social entrepreneurship ecosystems while offering practical insights for policymakers, development agencies, and practitioners seeking to cultivate supportive environments for socially driven ventures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Mair and I. Martí, “Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight,” J. World Bus., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002.

G. Desa and S. Basu, “Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship,” Strateg. Entrep. J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 26–49, 2013.

T. Khanna and K. G. Palepu, Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Press, 2010.

W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 128–152, 1990.

P. T. Roundy, “Social entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Complementary or disjoint phenomena?,” Int. J. Soc. Econ., vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1252–1267, 2017.

E. Stam, “Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique,” Eur. Plan. Stud., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1759–1769, 2015.

N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021.

A. A. Samwick, “The economics of social entrepreneurship,” J. Econ. Educ., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 176–180, 2022.

M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” J. Informetr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017.

S. Elsevier, “Scopus content coverage guide,” Amesterdam Elsevier BV, 2016.

R. A. McCain, “A linguistic conception of rationality,” Soc. Sci. Inf., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 233–255, 1991.

G. Robertson, K. Cameron, M. Czerwinski, and D. Robbins, “Animated visualization of multiple intersecting hierarchies,” Inf. Vis., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–65, 2002.

N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

R. Biggs, F. R. Westley, and S. R. Carpenter, “Navigating the back loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 15, no. 2, 2010.

T. A. Thompson, J. M. Purdy, and M. J. Ventresca, “How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle,” Strateg. Entrep. J., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 96–116, 2018.

A. Rahdari, S. Sepasi, and M. Moradi, “Achieving sustainability through Schumpeterian social entrepreneurship: The role of social enterprises,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 137, pp. 347–360, 2016.

S. Khavul and G. D. Bruton, “Harnessing innovation for change: Sustainability and poverty in developing countries,” J. Manag. Stud., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 285–306, 2013.

G. Surie, “Creating the innovation ecosystem for renewable energy via social entrepreneurship: Insights from India,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 121, pp. 184–195, 2017.

I. Bozhikin, J. Macke, and L. F. da Costa, “The role of government and key non-state actors in social entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 226, pp. 730–747, 2019.