Mediating Function of Sustainable Agriculture in The Impact of FinTech on AI-Based Green Marketing

Authors

  • Ascasaputra Aditya University of Widya Mataram
  • Bhenu Artha Universitas Widya Mataram
  • Antonius Satria Hadi University of Widya Mataram
  • Bahri Bahri University of Widya Mataram
  • Niken Permata Sari University of Widya Mataram
  • Utami Tunjung Sari University of Widya Mataram
  • Cahya Purnama Asri University of Widya Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3384

Keywords:

Fintech, Sustainability, Agriculture, Artificial Intelligence, Green Marketing, Theoretical Review

Abstract

Global sustainability agendas, especially in the agricultural sector, are being advanced by the convergence of green marketing, sustainable agriculture, and technological innovation. Green marketing orientation gauges an organization's commitment to putting strategic, tactical, and internal procedures and activities into place with the goal of developing, communicating, and delivering goods and/or services with the least amount of environmental impact. FinTech is the use of cutting-edge digital technologies, like blockchain, digital credit, mobile banking, and alternative data analytics, to provide financial services, particularly in areas where traditional systems are still insufficiently advanced or exclusive. By improving efficiency, increasing access, lowering transaction costs, and promoting financial inclusion, all of which are essential components of sustainable development, FinTech has quickly upended traditional financial infrastructures. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of fintech on sustainable agriculture and ultimately affect artificial intelligence (AI)-based green marketing. This research uses theoretical literature review as a research method. Authors found that fintech affects sustainable agriculture, and AI-based green marketing affected by sustainable agriculture. Digital finance has emerged as a transformative force in the agricultural sector, reshaping how farmers, agribusinesses, and intermediaries access and manage financial services. The agricultural value chain, which encompasses production, processing, distribution, and retail, has historically faced challenges related to inefficiency, lack of transparency, and limited access to credit. By integrating digital technologies such as mobile banking, blockchain, and digital payment systems, financial transactions within agriculture are becoming more transparent, accessible, and efficient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Patil, Y. M., Bhatnagar, N., & Banarjee, S. (2025). Unveiling the Role of FinTech in Advancing Sustainable Development Goals: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 15(3), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15796067

Wang, G., & Zhang, H. (2025). FinTech-Driven Corporate Sustainability: A Technology–Organization–Environment Framework Analysis. Sustainability, 17(19), 8748. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198748

Rufaidah, F., Karyani, T., Wulandari, E., & Setiawan, I. (2023). A Review of the Implementation of Financial Technology (Fintech) in the Indonesian Agricultural Sector: Issues, Access, and Challenges. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(3), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11030108

Papadas, K.K., Avlonitis, G.J., & Carrigan, M. (2017). Green marketing orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. J. Bus. Res. 80, 236–246

Kishor, K., Bansal, S.K. & Kumar, R. (2025). The Role of Fintech in Promoting Financial Inclusion to Achieve Sustainable Development: An Integrated Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review. J Knowl Econ 16, 5664–5692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02168-5

Elena Loukoianova, Fabio M Natalucci, Yi David Wang, and Shiho Kanada. (2024). Fintech Applications for Boosting Climate Finance. Staff Climate Notes 2024, 008, accessed November 3, 2025, https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400293740.066

Benni, N. (2023). Fintech innovation for smallholder agriculture – A review of experiences. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc9117en

López, M. J., Sanz, A., & Pineda, M. (2021). Adoption of Fintech Solutions in Agriculture: Barriers and Facilitators. Agricultural Economics, 52(2).

Indrianingsih, R.S. (2025). Fintech as an Enabler of Economic Development: A Case Study of Agroindustry Actors in Subang Regency. Subang International Journal of Governance and Accountability (SINGA), 3(1).

Liu, M., Chen, X., & Jiao, Y. (2024). Sustainable Agriculture: Theories, Methods, Practices and Policies. Agriculture, 14(3), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030473

Botero-Valencia, J., García-Pineda, V., Valencia-Arias, A., Valencia, J., Reyes-Vera, E., Mejia-Herrera, M., & Hernández-García, R. (2025). Machine Learning in Sustainable Agriculture: Systematic Review and Research Perspectives. Agriculture, 15(4), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15040377

Muduva, M., Kiwa, F.J. (2025). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Green Marketing Strategies for a Circular Economy. In: Muposhi, A., Nyagadza, B. (eds) Sustainable Green Marketing Strategies for a Circular Economy. Palgrave Studies of Marketing in Emerging Economies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81627-7_11

Mineeth, B.M., Sankar, J.G., Ragineni, A. & Vuppala, S. (2025). AI in green marketing: Driving sustainable consumer behaviour through personalization. Asian Journal of Management and Commerce 2025; SP-6(2): 313-317

Abu-Bader, S., & Jones, T.V. (2021). Statistical Mediation Analysis Using The Sobel Test and Hayes SPSS Process Macro. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Method, 9(1), 42-61.

Xiaojing, Z., Jiamin, Y., Huijie, C., Xiaoyu, Z., & Yanling, X. (2023). The effect of urbanization on agricultural eco-efficiency and mediation analysis. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1199446

Vasiljeva, T., Shaikhulina, S., and Kreslins, K. (2017). Cloud Computing: Business Perspectives, Benefits and Challenges for Small and Medium Enterprises (Case of Latvia), Procedia Engineering, 178: 443-451.

Torkayesh, A.E., Tirkolaee, E.B., Bahrini, A., Pamucar, D., and Khakbaz, A. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review of MABAC Method and Applications: An Outlook for Sustainability and Circularity, Informatica 34: 415-448.

Vasudevan, A., Rani, P.J., Raja, N., Nedumaran, G., Arokiasamy, A.R., & Qian, C. (2025). Fintech for sustainable agriculture: insights from Tamil Nadu, India. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.

Mapanje, O.; Karuaihe, S.; Machethe, C.; Amis, M. (2023). Financing Sustainable Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of the Role of Financial Technologies. Sustainability, 15, 4587. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054587

Kumar, P. (2025). Sustainable Marketing Strategies in FinTech: Evaluating Financial and Environmental Impacts. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology.

Sharma, A., Mohan, A., Johri, A., & Asif, M. (2024). Determinants of fintech adoption in agrarian economy: Study of UTAUT extension model in reference to developing economies. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100273.

Downloads

Published

27-11-2025

How to Cite

[1]
A. Aditya, “Mediating Function of Sustainable Agriculture in The Impact of FinTech on AI-Based Green Marketing”, RIGGS, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2467–2473, Nov. 2025.