The Influence of Project Scheduling Effectiveness and Administrative Efficiency on the Performance of Telecommunication Tower Construction Management at PT Dayamitra Telekomunikasi, Tbk Regional Office Central Sumatra

Pitri Rahmadani Harahap; Kurniani Kurniani; Achmad Zaenuddin

doi:10.31004/riggs.v5i2.9543

Authors

Pitri Rahmadani Harahap Universitas Pamulang
Kurniani Kurniani Semarang State Polytechnic
Achmad Zaenuddin Semarang State Polytechnic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i2.9543

Keywords:

Project Scheduling Effectiveness, Administrative Efficiency, Development Management Performance

Abstract

The performance of infrastructure development management is one of the important aspects in the successful implementation of projects, especially in the telecommunications sector which requires punctuality, administrative efficiency, and good work coordination. This study aims to analyze the influence of project scheduling effectiveness and administrative efficiency on the performance of telecommunication tower construction management at PT Dayamitra Telekomunikasi Tbk, Regional Office Sumbagteng. The study uses a quantitative approach with a sampling technique in the form of saturated sampling of the entire population totaling 31 respondents. Data collection was carried out through observation, literature study, and the distribution of questionnaires that have gone through validity and reliability tests. The data analysis methods used included classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression analysis, hypothesis tests, and determination coefficients with the help of SPSS version 25 application. The results of the study show that the effectiveness of project scheduling and administrative efficiency have a positive and significant influence on the management performance of telecommunication tower construction. Based on the results of multiple linear regression analysis, the equation Y = –0.445 + 0.568X₁ + 0.439X₂ was obtained, which shows that any improvement in project scheduling effectiveness and administrative efficiency will improve the performance of development management. The value of the determination coefficient (R²) of 0.622 indicates that the two independent variables contribute 62.2% to the performance of development management, while the remaining 37.8% is influenced by other factors outside the study. Thus, companies need to improve the accuracy of project scheduling and optimal administrative management to support the success of telecommunication infrastructure development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Adam, A., Witjaksana, B., & Tjendani, M. (2022). Factors causing delays in telecommunications infrastructure projects: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 27(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2022.27.1.3

2. Al-Aomar, R., & Waller, J. (2020). Apply lean thinking to improve the performance of telecommunication projects. International Journal of Project Management, 38(5), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.02.001

3. Chan, D.W., & Kumaraswamy, MM (1997). A comparative study of the causes of overtime in Hong Kong construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 15(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00039-7

4. Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M., Donnelly, J.H., & Konopaske, R. (2021). Organization: Behavior, structure, process (15th edition). McGraw-Hill Education.

5. Kerzner, H. (2022). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and control (13th edition). Wiley.

6. Lestari, R., & Handoko, B. (2021). Communication barriers in construction projects: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Civil Engineering and Planning, 23(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.28932/jtsp.v23i2.3485

7. Majid, I., & McCaffer, R. (1997). Assessment of the work performance of maintenance contractors in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Engineering Management, 13(5), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1997)13:5(91)

8. Nurcahyo, A., & Indramawan, A. (2020). Bureaucratic barriers and their impact on project completion time in telecommunications infrastructure. Indonesian Infrastructure Journal, 6(2), 101–112.

9. PMI. (2021). Project management knowledge body guide (PMBOK® Guide) (7th edition). Project Management Institute.

10. Purnama, A., & Sugiyono, S. (2021). Application of the Critical Line Method in accelerating construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Planning, 23(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.28932/jtsp.v23i2.3481

11. Ramadhani, N., Nugraha, D., & Wibowo, A. (2022). Digital transformation in project administration: Improving efficiency and transparency. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(4), 04022010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002234

12. Robbins, S.P., & Coulter, M. (2022). Management (15th edition). Pearson Education.

13. Siregar, A., & Fauzan, M. (2021). Challenges in BTS tower construction in remote areas: Case study in Sumatra. Journal of Indonesian Telecommunication Infrastructure, 4(1), 12–22.

14. Taghipour, S., Noori, S., & Zarandi, M.H. (2020). Improve project schedule reliability using critical chain project management under uncertainty. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 16(2), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-019-00340-5

15. Wijaya, F., Santoso, I., & Rahardjo, H. (2023). Cross-divisional collaboration for administrative efficiency in construction projects. Journal of Project Management Research, 7(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpmr.2023.01.005

16. World Bank. (2021). Digital transformation of government services: Streamlining permits for infrastructure. World Bank Publications.

17. Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2021). Cloud-based administration management system to improve organizational efficiency. Automation in Construction, 125, 103606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103606