Analyzing Satisfaction and Continuance Intention in Capital Market School Level 2

Authors

  • Sahupriadi Sahupriadi Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Utomo Sarjono Putro institut teknologi bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i2.825

Keywords:

Capital Market School, Participant Satisfaction, Continuance Intention, Quality of Teaching, Institutional Offering, Participant Motivation

Abstract

This study analyzes factors influencing participant satisfaction and their continuance intention to enroll in the Level 2 Capital Market School (SPM) program in Indonesi. Despite the rising number of investors, the transition rate from Level 1 to Level 2 shows a decline, raising concerns about learner retention. Guided by the Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM), this research examines the effects of Quality of Teaching, Institutional Offering, and Participant Motivation on participant satisfaction and their intention to continue. Using data collected from 163 SPM Level 1 participants in Bandung and analyzed through Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS), the study confirms that all three factors positively influence satisfaction, which in turn significantly impacts continuance intention. The findings highlight the mediating role of satisfaction in promoting ongoing engagement with capital market education. The results suggest that enhancing instructional quality, improving institutional support, and fostering participant motivation are key to increasing retention rates for advanced financial education programs. This research provides valuable insights for policymakers and educators aiming to strengthen investor education and support Indonesia’s growing capital market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Alavi, Y. Yoo, and D. R. Vogel, "Using information technology to add value to management education," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 749–768, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069306

M. Ali and A. Tariq, "The influence of institutional services on student satisfaction: Empirical evidence from higher education in Pakistan," Higher Educ. Stud., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65–75, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v11n1p65

H. Alqurashi, "Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments," Distance Educ., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 319–338, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1232159

Bakri et al., "University service quality and student satisfaction," Manag. Sci. Lett., vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1433–1444, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.4.005

Bhattacherjee, "Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model," MIS Q., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 351–370, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Bureau, R. Vallerand, and M. Forest, "Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in academic settings," Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 65, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101940

W. W. Chin, "The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling," in Modern Methods for Business Research, G. A. Marcoulides, Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, pp. 295–336.

L. Deng, Q. Chen, and M. Chen, "Investigating the roles of motivation and satisfaction in online learning continuance," Internet High. Educ., vol. 57, 100872, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100872

J. Douglas, A. Douglas, and B. Barnes, "Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university," Qual. Assur. Educ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 251–267, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880610678568

S. Eom, H. Wen, and N. Ashill, "The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education," Decis. Sci. J. Innov. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 215–235, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x

C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error," J. Mark. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1981. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

R. Gopal, S. Singh, and N. Aggarwal, "Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID-19," Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, pp. 6923–6947, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1

J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2017.

J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, "PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet," J. Mark. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2011.11501890

Hasanu, "Pengaruh literasi keuangan terhadap perilaku investasi," J. Akunt. dan Keuang. Islam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020.

M. Hassan and R. Mustapha, "Student satisfaction with university support services in Malaysian public universities," Asian J. Univ. Educ., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v15i2.7567

J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, "A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling," J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

S. Hrastinski, "What do we mean by blended learning?," TechTrends, vol. 65, pp. 505–509, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00636-z

L. Hu and P. M. Bentler, "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives," Struct. Equ. Model., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–55, 1999. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), Annual Report 2021–2023, Jakarta: IDX, 2023.

H. Kaur, R. Singh, and M. K. Sharma, "Exploring the role of accessibility in online learning satisfaction," Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00410-5

Kustodian Sentral Efek Indonesia (KSEI), Data SID 2023 dan Januari 2024, Jakarta: KSEI, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ksei.co.id/

P. Kotler and K. L. Keller, Marketing Management, 15th ed. Pearson Education, 2016.

Y.-C. Kuo, A. E. Walker, B. R. Belland, and K. E. Schroder, "A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 16–39, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338

S. Laumer, D. Maier, and T. Weitzel, "Information quality, user satisfaction, and the use of information systems: A longitudinal field study of a public online service," Inf. Syst. J., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 503–531, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12106

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Survei Nasional Literasi dan Inklusi Keuangan (SNLIK) 2024, Jakarta: OJK, 2024.

Osman and D. Saputra, "Customer satisfaction as a key success factor in education services," J. Bisnis dan Manaj., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 2019.

M. Paechter, B. Maier, and D. Macher, "Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction," Comput. Educ., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 222–229, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005

F. U. Rehman, A. Khalil, and M. I. Asghar, "Impact of teacher competence on student satisfaction: Evidence from Pakistan," J. Educ. Res., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 45–59, 2020.

F. Rehman, M. M. Asghar, and A. Ahmad, "Impact of teaching quality on student satisfaction in e-learning," J. Educ. E-Learn. Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 123–130, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.72.123.130

R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, "Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions," Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 54–67, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

H. Situmorang, "Peran SPM Level 2 dalam membangun portofolio investasi," IDX Corner Series, 2021.

H. M. Than and H. S. Khaing, "A study of student satisfaction and continuance intention in e-learning context," Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.1.1336

Y. Wang and X. Liu, "Satisfaction and continuance intention in online education," Comput. Educ., vol. 165, 104118, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104118

S. Wisenthige, R. Jayasundara, and M. Gunasekera, "Impact of service quality on student satisfaction: A case study," J. Manag. Res. Anal., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2025.

Downloads

Published

07-06-2025

How to Cite

[1]
S. Sahupriadi and U. S. Putro, “Analyzing Satisfaction and Continuance Intention in Capital Market School Level 2”, RIGGS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2186–2195, Jun. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles