Dinamika Sosial Ekonomi Pasca Renovasi Pasar Sentral di Kota Gorontalo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4576Keywords:
Dinamika Sosial, Renovasi Pasar Sentral, Kota GorontaloAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dinamika sosial dan ekonomi pasca renovasi Pasar Sentral di Kota Gorontalo dengan menyoroti perubahan struktur sosial, pola interaksi ekonomi, serta dampaknya terhadap kesejahteraan masyarakat lokal. Renovasi pasar tidak hanya diharapkan memperbaiki infrastruktur fisik, tetapi juga memperkuat fungsi sosial dan ekonomi sebagai pusat aktivitas masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui studi lapangan dengan teknik observasi, wawancara mendalam, dan dokumentasi yang melibatkan pedagang, pengelola pasar, serta masyarakat sekitar. Analisis data dilakukan secara tematik dengan menggunakan kerangka Struktural Fungsionalisme Talcott Parsons yang memandang masyarakat sebagai sistem sosial yang terdiri dari bagian-bagian saling bergantung untuk mencapai keseimbangan melalui empat fungsi utama: Adaptation, Goal Attainment, Integration, dan Latency (AGIL). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa renovasi membawa dampak positif terhadap peningkatan fasilitas, kenyamanan, dan kualitas hubungan sosial antara pedagang dan pembeli, namun belum memberikan peningkatan signifikan terhadap pendapatan pedagang akibat minimnya promosi dan berkurangnya jumlah pengunjung. Secara sosial, renovasi memperkuat solidaritas dan loyalitas antar pelaku pasar, sedangkan dari sisi ekonomi masih dibutuhkan dukungan kebijakan serta strategi promosi yang lebih efektif. Dengan demikian, renovasi Pasar Sentral Kota Gorontalo menciptakan bentuk keseimbangan sosial baru sesuai kerangka Struktural Fungsionalisme Parsons, namun keseimbangan tersebut belum stabil secara ekonomi sehingga diperlukan upaya adaptif dan kolaboratif agar pasar dapat berfungsi optimal sebagai pusat kegiatan sosial dan ekonomi masyarakat.
Downloads
References
Weyher LF. Re-reading sociology via the emotions: karl marx’s theory of human nature and estrangement. Sociological Perspectives. 2012;55(2):341–63.
Haraway D. Animal sociology and a natural economy of the body politic, part II: the past is the contested zone: human nature and theories of production and reproduction in primate behavior studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 1978;4(1):37–60.
Murphy R. Sociology and nature: Social action in context. Routledge; 2018.
Moffett MW. Human identity and the evolution of societies. Human Nature. 2013;24(3):219–67.
Bogucki P. The origins of human society. John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
Tapper R. Animality, humanity, morality, society. In: What is an Animal? Routledge; 2016. p. 47–62.
Parsons T. The present status of “structural-functional” theory in sociology. In: The idea of social structure. Routledge; 2017. p. 67–84.
Hudson J. Structural functional theory, social work practice and education. J Soc & Soc Welfare. 1978;5:481.
Minott SS. Validation of parsons’ structural functionalism theory within a multicultural human. 2016;
Fligstein N, Dauter L. The sociology of markets. Annu Rev Sociol. 2007;33(1):105–28.
Aspers P. Markets, sociology of. 2005;
Badan Pusat Statistik. Dashboard Visualisasi Data BPS [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Nov 29]. Available from: https://direktori.web.bps.go.id/metabase.php?id=555
Moleong LJ. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Revisi). Bandung: PT remaja rosdakarya. 2017;102–7.
Schafer M, Schiller D. Navigating social space. Neuron. 2018;100(2):476–89.
Bourdieu P. Social space and symbolic power. Sociological theory. 1989;7(1):14–25.
Bourdieu P. The social space and the genesis of groups. Social science information. 1985;24(2):195–220.
Williams C, Smith AD. The national construction of social space. Progress in human geography. 1983;7(4):502–18.
Kornbluh A. The order of forms: Realism, formalism, and social space. In: The Order of Forms. University of Chicago Press; 2019.
Storr VH. The market as a social space: On the meaningful extraeconomic conversations that can occur in markets. The Review of Austrian Economics. 2008;21(2):135–50.
McCarthy JF, McDonald DW, Soroczak S, Nguyen DH, Rashid AM. Augmenting the social space of an academic conference. In 2004. p. 39–48.
Biggart NW, Castanias RP. Collateralized social relations: The social in economic calculation. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2001;60(2):471–500.
Porter GR. The progress of the nation, in its various social and economical relations, from the beginning of the nineteenth century. J. Murray; 1847.
Van Staveren I, Knorringa P. Unpacking social capital in economic development: How social relations matter. Review of social economy. 2007;65(1):107–35.
Kolm SC. Reciprocity: An economics of social relations. Cambridge University Press; 2008.
Potocky-Tripodi M. The role of social capital in immigrant and refugee economic adaptation. Journal of Social Service Research. 2004;31(1):59–91.
Allen R. Benefit or burden? Social capital, gender, and the economic adaptation of refugees. International Migration Review. 2009;43(2):332–65.
Pelling M, High C. Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Global environmental change. 2005;15(4):308–19.
Adger WN. Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. In: Der klimawandel: Sozialwissenschaftliche perspektiven. Springer; 2010. p. 327–45.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pikran Naru, Rauf A. Hatu, Sahrain Bumulo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















