Work Motivation as a Mediating Factor in the Relationship Between Personality, Competence, and Employee Performance at PT Padmatirta Wisesa

Authors

  • Imam Zunaidi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Mahardhika
  • Sundjoto Sundjoto Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Mahardhika
  • Sri Rahayu Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Mahardhika
  • Rifda Fitrianty Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Mahardhika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4132

Keywords:

Personality, Competence, Work Motivation, Employee Performance

Abstract

This article analyzes the strategic role of work motivation in mediating the influence of personality and competence on employee performance at PT Padmatirta Wisesa, operating in the FMCG distribution industry where operational speed and service quality are crucial. Current declines in performance indicators show an urgent need to improve employee attributes and capabilities to remain competitive. A quantitative survey method was implemented, with 35 employees involved as a complete sample. The collected data were evaluated using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to measure structural relationships and mediation significance. The statistical findings demonstrate that both personality and competence have significant positive direct effects on performance, and competence is identified as the dominant factor. Moreover, motivation significantly strengthens these effects, indicating that employees’ strengths in character and knowledge must be supported by a strong intention to achieve in order to deliver superior outcomes. These insights suggest that organizations should not only focus on enhancing skills and knowledge but also design interventions that boost motivational conditions, including performance-based incentives, recognition mechanisms, and career progression accessibility. The study recommends that future investigations expand the proposed model by integrating factors such as organizational climate, workload pressure, or digital readiness to better understand performance determinants in distribution-based environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Borissov, “Enterprises as Complex Systems: Navigating Challenges and Embracing Resilience,” Bus. Ethics Leadersh., vol. 8, pp. 95–122, 2024.

E. Ras, F. Wild, C. Stahl, and A. Baudet, “Bridging the Skills Gap of Workers in Industry 4.0 by Human Performance Augmentation Tools: Challenges and Roadmap,” 2017, pp. 428–432. doi: 10.1145/3056540.3076192.

A. Bandura, “Cultivate Self-Efficacy for Personal and Organizational Effectiveness,” Blackwell Handb. Princ. Organ. Behav., 2000, doi: 10.1002/9781119206422.ch10.

M. Smith, P. Jordan, and C. Wallace, “Personality and Individual Differences,” 2015, pp. 13–37. doi: 10.1002/9781118979013.ch2.

I. Skačkauskienė, D. Hrušecká, A. Katinienė, and M. Cepel, “Evaluation of knowledge synergy components,” E+M Ekon. a Manag., vol. 21, pp. 144–158, 2018, doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2018-1-010.

S. Ahmad, “Motivation and Performance- A Psychological Process,” Int. J. Bus. Manag. Res., vol. 9, 2021, doi: 10.37391/IJBMR.090201.

K.-C. Chang, Y.-T. Hsu, Y.-S. Cheng, and N.-T. Kuo, “How work engagement influences relationship quality: The roles of work motivation and perceived service guarantee strength,” Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., 2019, doi: 10.1080/14783363.2019.1700107.

V. Rivai and E. J. Sagala, Manajemen sumber daya manusia untuk perusahaan dari teori ke praktik. Jakarta: Rajawali, 2011.

S. Indrastuti, “Pengaruh Kepribadian terhadap Kinerja Karyawan dengan Variabel Intervening Kompetensi Karyawan Pada Mutiara Merdeka Hotel Pekanbaru,” J. Ekon. KIAT, vol. 32, 2021, doi: 10.25299/kiat.2021.vol32(2).8376.

B. Waluyo, E. Syarifuddin, and N. Anriani, “Pengaruh Motivasi Berprestasi dan Kompetensi Kepribadian Terhadap Kinerja Dosen Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang,” J. Simki Pedagog., vol. 6, pp. 520–530, 2023, doi: 10.29407/jsp.v6i2.91.

A. Sopandi, “PENGARUH KOMPETENSI PROFESIONAL DAN KOMPETENSI KEPRIBADIAN TERHADAP KINERJA GURU,” Sci. J. Reflect. Econ. Accounting, Manag. Bus., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–130, 2019, doi: 10.37481/sjr.v2i2.58.

M. Siregar and S. P. Faddilla, “PENGARUH MOTIVASI TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN DI JOVANBEAUTY,” J. Pijar, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 559–565, 2023, doi: 10.65096/pmb.v1i3.574.

J. Henseler, G. Hubona, and P. Ray, “Using PLS Path Modeling in New Technology Research: Updated Guidelines,” Ind. Manag. &amp Data Syst., vol. 116, pp. 2–20, 2016, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382.

J. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N. Danks, and S. Ray, “Evaluation of Reflective Measurement Models,” 2021, pp. 75–90. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_4.

G. Cheung, H. Cooper-Thomas, R. Lau, and L. Wang, “Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations,” Asia Pacific J. Manag., vol. 41, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y.

J. F. Hair, M. C. Howard, and C. Nitzl, “Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 109, pp. 101–110, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069.

D. Ong, “PLS-SEM path analysis to determine the predictive relevance of e-Health readiness assessment model,” Health Technol. (Berl)., vol. 10, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12553-020-00484-9.

Z. Osman, A. Rahman, S. Senathirajah, and R. Haque, “A Structured Equation Modelling on the Indirect Effect of Self- Efficacy on Extrinsic Motivation and Students’ Performance Relationship in Malaysian Online Distance Learning Institutions,” pp. 2765–2774, 2022.

O. Arifudin and H. Ali, “Teacher Personality Competence In Building The Character Of Students,” Int. J. Educ. Digit. Learn., vol. 1, pp. 5–12, 2022, doi: 10.47353/ijedl.v1i1.3.

S. Hassan and D. Hatmaker, “Leadership and Performance of Public Employees: Effects of the Quality and Characteristics of Manager-Employee Relationships,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 25, 2014, doi: 10.1093/jopart/muu002.

S. Saleh, Z. Mohamad Ashari, and A. Kosnin, “Personality traits and intrinsic motivation on academic performance,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, pp. 317–322, 2018, doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.28.22607.

L. A. Manafe, M. Wahib, M. Zebua, R. Andriana, and Y. Erawati, “IS EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE INFLUENCED BY DISCIPLINE, MOTIVATION, AND COMPETENCE? A STUDY ON SALON AND BEAUTY EQUIPMENT BUSINESS,” Int. J. Econ. Bus. Account. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.29040/ijebar.v8i1.12756.

M. Salman, S. A. Ganie, and I. Saleem, “The concept of competence: a thematic review and discussion,” Eur. J. Train. Dev., vol. 44, no. 6–7, pp. 717–742, 2020, doi: 10.1108/EJTD-10-2019-0171.

B. Birdayanthi, Y. Yusriadi, and I. Ikmal, “Accountability and Transparency in Public Administration for Improved Service Delivery,” J. Soc. Civilecial, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 34–47, 2025, doi: 10.71435/610633.

W. Reid and C. Dold, “Leadership Training and the Problems of Competency Development,” J. Public Heal. Manag. Pract., vol. 23, p. 1, 2016, doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000456.

D. Areas and S. E. Vol, “Effective Leadership and Employee Motivation for Sustainable Development Dr. A. E. Ned and Chukwudi Dike Umesi,” J. Educ. Dev. Areas, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 310–321, 2023.

C. Rigby and R. Ryan, “Self-Determination Theory in Human Resource Development: New Directions and Practical Considerations,” Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour., vol. 20, pp. 133–147, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1523422318756954.

D. Enyia, “A CRITICAL REVIEW AND COMPARISM BETWEEN MASLOW, HERZBERG AND McCLELLAND’S THEORY OF NEEDS,” Linkedin, 2017.

D. Szostek, “Employee Behaviors toward Using and Saving Energy at Work. The Impact of Personality Traits,” Energies, vol. 14, p. 3404, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14123404.

R. Fischer and D. Boer, “Motivational Basis of Personality Traits: A Meta-Analysis of Value-Personality Correlations,” J. Pers., vol. 83, 2014, doi: 10.1111/jopy.12125.

M. Zhou, “Moderating effect of self-determination in the relationship between Big Five personality and academic performance,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 86, pp. 385–389, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.005.

A. Isabirye, K. Moloi, and R. Lebelo, “Examining the role of managerial assertiveness and self-confidence in enhancing employees’ loyalty and productivity: A theoretical perspective,” Edelweiss Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, pp. 1159–1174, 2025, doi: 10.55214/25768484.v9i3.5444.

R. Sabuhari, A. Sudiro, D. Irawanto, and M. Rahayu, “The effects of human resource flexibility, employee competency, organizational culture adaptation and job satisfaction on employee performance,” Manag. Sci. Lett., vol. 10, pp. 1777–1786, 2020, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2020.1.001.

I. Owoeye, “Competence-Enhancing Interventions and Organisational Performance: A Theoretical Review,” J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 6, p. 67, 2018, doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20180602.14.

T. Vuong and L. Nguyen, “The Key Strategies for Measuring Employee Performance in Companies: A Systematic Review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, p. 14017, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142114017.

Downloads

Published

08-12-2025

How to Cite

[1]
I. Zunaidi, S. Sundjoto, S. Rahayu, and R. Fitrianty, “Work Motivation as a Mediating Factor in the Relationship Between Personality, Competence, and Employee Performance at PT Padmatirta Wisesa”, RIGGS, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 3898–3906, Dec. 2025.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>