Pengaruh Capital Intensity Ratio (CIR), Debt to Asset Ratio (DAR), dan Kompensasi Kerugian Fiskal terhadap Effective Tax Rate (ETR) pada Perusahaan Sektor Properti yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2019-2023

Gabrielle Yudhistira; Nurul Izzah Lubis; Emi Masyitah

doi:10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4080

Authors

Gabrielle Yudhistira Universitas Potensi Utama
Nurul Izzah Lubis Universitas Potensi Utama
Emi Masyitah Universitas Potensi Utama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4080

Keywords:

Capital Intensity Ratio, Debt To Asset Ratio, Tax Loss Carry Forward, Effective Tax Rate

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to test and analyze the effect of the Capital Intensity Ratio, Debt to Asset Ratio, and Tax Loss Carryforward on the Effective Tax Rate in state-owned enterprises listed in the property sector for the period 2019–2023. This study uses a quantitative research approach to examine the causal relationship between independent variables and the dependent variable through statistical analysis. The population of this study consists of companies in the property sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2019-2023. The sampling technique applied was purposive sampling, resulting in 20 companies selected. The data used are secondary data obtained from the companies’ annual financial statements. Data analysis was conducted using multiple linear regression analysis. Prior to hypothesis testing, classical assumption tests were performed to ensure the validity of the regression model. Hypothesis testing was carried out using t-tests to examine the partial effects of each independent variable, F-tests to assess the simultaneous effects, and the coefficient of determination to measure the model’s explanatory power. All analyses were processed using SPSS version 25. The results indicate that the Capital Intensity Ratio has a negative effect on the Effective Tax Rate, the Debt to Asset Ratio also has a negative effect on the Effective Tax Rate, while Tax Loss Carryforward has a positive effect on the Effective Tax Rate. Simultaneously, the results show that the Capital Intensity Ratio, Debt to Asset Ratio, and Tax Loss Carryforward have a significant effect on the Effective Tax Rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah, N., & Mawardi, M. C. (2018). Pengaruh Debt to Asset Ratio terhadap Effective Tax Rate. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 10(2), 133–144.

Amidu, xM., Coffie, W., & Acquah, P. (2016). Transfer Pricing, EarningsiManagement and Tax Avoidancexof Firms in Ghana. International Journal of Accounting and Finance, 6(1), 1–23.

Andika, R., & Widya, P. (2017). Bisnis Properti dan Tantangannya. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 18(1), 23–34.

Arifianto, A., & Kartika, R. (2020). Capital Intensity dan TaxcAvoidance: Bukti Empiris pada Perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(2), 301–315.

Bank Indonesia. (2021). Laporan Perekonomian Indonesia 2021. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are Family Firms More Tax Aggressive Than Non-Family Firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61.

Chytia, F., & Bayu, A. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Capital Intensity, Kepemilikan Institusional, DAR, dan ROA terhadap ETR pada Perusahaan Properti. Jurnal Bina Akuntansi, 8(1), 15–27.

Citra, R., & Maya, N. (2016). Pengaruh Capital Intensity Ratio, Inventory Intensity, Ownership Structure, dan Profitability terhadap Effective Tax Rate. JIMEKA, 1(1), 35–48.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A Review of Tax Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 127–178.

Herawati, R., & Nurkhin, A. (2022). Kompensasi Kerugian Fiskal dan Tax Planning. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Perpajakan, 9(2), 66–78.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Kasmir. (2017). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Khusniyah, N., & Nur, A. (2017). Pengaruh Size, Leverage, Profitability, CIR, dan AR terhadap Effective Tax Rate. Jurnal Ekonomi UIM, 6(17), 77–89.

Kusumawardani, R., & Supriyadi. (2019). Capital Intensity, Inventory Intensity, dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 19(1), 25–35.

Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2007). Corporate Governance and Tax Aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 761–792.

Mardiasmo. (2019). Perpajakan Edisi Terbaru. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Minnick, K., & Noga, T. (2010). Do Corporate Governance Characteristics Influence Tax Management? Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(5), 703–718.

Nadela, R., & Sekar, D. (2023). Pengaruh Related Party Transaction, Thin Capitalization, Intangible Assets, dan Kompensasi Kerugian Fiskal terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 3(2), 89–100.

Pohan, C. A. (2016). Manajemen Perpajakan: Strategi Perencanaan Pajak dan Bisnis. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Rego, S. O., & Wilson, R. (2012). Equity Risk Incentives and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 775–810.

Richardson, G., & Lanis, R. (2007). Determinants of the Variability in Corporate Effective Tax Rates and Tax Reform: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 689–704.

Sari, A. P., & Wibowo, T. (2021). Pengaruh Capital Intensity dan Leverage terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer Indonesia, 3(1), 22–35.

Scholes, M., Wolfson, M., Erickson, M., Maydew, E., & Shevlin, T. (2005). Taxes and Business Strategy: A Planning Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Sitorus, T., & Rachmawati, N. (2021). Prospek Bisnis Properti di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 14(2), 55–67.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tiffani, N., & Mastar, D. (2019). Pengaruh CIR, Leverage, Profitability, dan Size terhadap ETR pada Perusahaan Konstruksi dan Bangunan. Jurnal Keuangan FEB Trisakti, 2(1), 14–25.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 tentang Pajak Penghasilan.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 tentang Kebijakan Keuangan Negara.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan.

Zain, M. (2008). Manajemen Perpajakan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Taxes and Firm Size. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 119–149.