Model Pembelajaran Tallasa Untuk Pembelajaran Biologi Yang Aktif, Kolaboratif, dan Reflektif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3774Keywords:
Kajian Konseptual, Model Pembelajaran TALLASA, Pembelajaran Biologi, Pembelajaran Digital, Keterampilan Abad ke-21Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan dan mendeskripsikan Model Pembelajaran TALLASA sebagai kerangka konseptual pembelajaran Biologi yang mengintegrasikan prinsip pembelajaran aktif, kolaboratif, dan reflektif. Model ini dikembangkan melalui kajian konseptual (conceptual study) yang menelaah teori konstruktivisme, behavioristik, dan kognitif-sosial, serta temuan empiris terkait pembelajaran sains abad ke-21. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa TALLASA terdiri atas tujuh tahapan pembelajaran, yaitu Trigger Curiosity, Analyze Scientifically, Learn Conceptually, Link Knowledge, Apply Reasoning, Share Understanding, dan Assess Transformation. Setiap tahap dirancang untuk menumbuhkan rasa ingin tahu, meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis, memperkuat kolaborasi, dan mendorong refleksi mendalam terhadap proses belajar siswa. Integrasi pendekatan psikologi pembelajaran tersebut memungkinkan proses pembelajaran Biologi berlangsung lebih aktif, bermakna, dan kontekstual. Melalui aktivitas pemecahan masalah, eksplorasi fenomena, diskusi kelompok, serta integrasi konsep secara bertahap, TALLASA memberikan pengalaman belajar yang menekankan konstruksi pengetahuan secara mandiri maupun sosial. Selain itu, model ini juga mendukung pengembangan keterampilan abad ke-21 seperti komunikasi efektif, kolaborasi, kreativitas, literasi digital, dan kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Relevansi TALLASA semakin kuat di era transformasi digital. Setiap tahap pembelajaran dapat dipadukan dengan media digital, simulasi virtual laboratorium, multimedia interaktif, sistem manajemen pembelajaran, serta platform kolaboratif daring. Hal ini membuka peluang penerapan TALLASA dalam pembelajaran digital, hybrid, maupun pembelajaran berbasis kecerdasan buatan. Dengan demikian, TALLASA dapat menjadi model pembelajaran yang adaptif dan kompatibel dengan kebutuhan pendidikan modern. Penelitian lanjutan disarankan untuk menguji efektivitas TALLASA secara empiris serta mengembangkannya sebagai perangkat pembelajaran digital maupun program pelatihan guru.
Downloads
References
E. Aulia, “Effects of 21st Century Learning on the Development of Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication, and Collaboration Skills,” Journal of Nonformal Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2022, doi: 10.15294/jne.v8i1.33334.
G. Voukelatou, “The Contribution of Experiential Learning to the Development of Cognitive and Social Skills in Secondary Education: A Case Study,” Educ Sci (Basel), vol. 9, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.3390/educsci9020127.
R. Yusri, A. M. Yusof, and A. Sharina, “A systematic literature review of project-based learning: research trends, methods, elements, and frameworks,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 3345–3359, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i5.27875.
A. R. Latif, M. Rizki, and D. Hazmi, “Integrative Framework of Instructional Strategies and Learning Design: A Systematic Conceptual Literature Review,” FIKROTUNA, vol. 14, no. 02, pp. 108–121, 2025, doi: 10.55583/jkip.v5i4.1181.
M. Fuadiyah, B. I. Norra, and F. Astutik, “Biology learning model to improve critical thinking skills of ten grade students: A meta-analysis,” Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 101–112, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.17509/aijbe.v5i2.46084.
I. Majid, R. M. Aboe, and A. N. Sari, “Effects of Biology Learning Models on Metacognitive Skills of Senior High School Students,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 13, no. 3, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.15294/nk3tdy23.
A. K. Hansen et al., “Biology beyond the Classroom: Experiential Learning through Authentic Research, Design, and Community Engagement,” in Integrative and Comparative Biology, Oxford University Press, Sep. 2021, pp. 926–933. doi: 10.1093/icb/icab155.
T. G. K. Bryce and E. J. Blown, “Ausubel’s meaningful learning re-visited,” Current Psychology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 4579–4598, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04440-4.
N. Hasnunidah, Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Media Akademi, 2017. Accessed: Nov. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://epustaka.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/pustaka/main/item/104523
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabrta, 2013.
M. . Hosnan and Risman. Sikumbang, Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21 : kunci sukses implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2014. Accessed: Nov. 02, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://openlibrary.org/works/OL23254609W/Pendekatan_saintifik_dan_kontekstual_dalam_pembelajaran_abad_21
A. Kervinen, W. M. Roth, K. Juuti, and A. Uitto, “The resurgence of everyday experiences in school science learning activities,” Cult Stud Sci Educ, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1019–1045, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11422-019-09968-1.
L. Aja, C. Chukwuemeka, and I. J. Elom, “Constructivist teaching approach and academic achievement in Biology among Senior Secondary School students,” FNAS Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2024, [Online]. Available: www.fnasjournals.com
A. Yusra, Neviyarni S, and Erianjoni, “A Review of Behaviorist Learning Theory and its Impact on the Learning Process in Schools,” International Journal of Educational Dynamics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 81–91, Dec. 2022, [Online]. Available: http://ijeds.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/IJEDS
F. Gunnars, “A large-scale systematic review relating behaviorism to research of digital technology in primary education,” Computers and Education Open, vol. 2, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100058.
S. M. Abdullah, “Social Cognitive Theory : A Bandura Thought Review published in 1982-2012,” PSIKODIMENSIA, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 85, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.24167/psidim.v18i1.1708.
N. S. A. Kadar, W. S. W. Yadri, N. D. Faris, M. D. M. Johari, K. N. Nurgeldiyevna, and N. H. Rahmat, “Exploring Online Group Work Through The Social Cognitive Theory,” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 13, no. 9, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i9/17744.
D. Amsari, E. Wahyuni, and F. Fadhilaturrahmi, “The Social Learning Theory Albert Bandura for Elementary School Students,” Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1654–1662, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v8i2.7247.
A. Mahbub and J. Beedle, “Behaviorists, Cognitivists, and Constructivists Learning Theories: A Comparison and Application in Instructional Design,” European Journal of Education Studies, vol. 12, no. 6, May 2025, doi: 10.46827/ejes.v12i6.6047.
F. Ali, Y. Wang, S. J. W. Wang, and G. Zhu, “Triggers of curiosity in social constructivist classroom discourse,” NPJ Sci Learn, vol. 10, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00330-5.
A. N. Putri, “The Development of an Inquiry-Based Laboratory Manual for Student of Biology Education,” Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, vol. 5, pp. 105–111, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JERE
P. Ajayan, R. Cao, and J. F. Eichler, “Promoting Conceptual Learning Using Scaffolded Activities That Incorporate Interactive Simulations,” Educ Sci (Basel), vol. 15, no. 5, May 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15050566.
A. Suciyati, I. G. P. Suryadarma, and P. Paidi, “Integration of ethnoscience in problem-based learning to improve contextuality and meaning of biology learning,” Biosfer, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 201–215, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.21009/biosferjpb.18424.
M. J. Chen, H. C. She, and P. Y. Tsai, “The effects of online simulation-based collaborative problem-solving on students’ problem-solving, communication and collaboration attitudes,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 19141–19162, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12609-y.
A. Djunaidi, “Improving Collaboration Abilities and Students’ Learning Outcomes Through Presentation Based Cooperative,” Online, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/MEJ
T. Djudin, “Writing Reflective Journal and Corrective Feedback: The Endeavors to Increase Students’ Physics Achievement of Dynamic Fluids,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), vol. 5, no. 3, p. 141, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v5i3.1809.
M. Teplá, P. Teplý, and P. Šmejkal, “Influence of 3D models and animations on students in natural subjects,” Int J STEM Educ, vol. 9, no. 1, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00382-8.
Zaitun, N. Arriyani, and D. Budianto, “ASSESSING TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESSES THROUGH REFLECTIVE LEARNING JOURNAL (A Classroom Action Research on the 11 th Graders of SMA Dharma Karya UT, South Tangerang, Indonesia),” IJRDO-Journal of Educational Research, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 25–31, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.53555/er.v5i8.2463.
J. Leskinen, K. Kumpulainen, A. Kajamaa, and A. Rajala, “The emergence of leadership in students’ group interaction in a school-based makerspace,” European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1033–1053, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10212-020-00509-x.
H. Hunaepi, M. Ikhsan, H. Suwono, and S. Sulisetijono, “Curiosity in Learning Biology: Literature Review,” Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 343, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.33394/j-ps.v9i2.4272.
A. Al-Barakat, R. AlAli, S. Alotaibi, J. Alrashood, A. Abdullatif, and A. Zaher, “Science Education as a Pathway to Sustainable Awareness: Teachers’ Perceptions on Fostering Understanding of Humans and the Environment: A Qualitative Study,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 17, no. 15, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17157136.
N. Rahmasari and Raharjo, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Laboratorium Virtual Interaktif terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA pada Materi Sistem Peredaran Darah,” BioEdu, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 719–723, 2023, doi: 10.26740/bioedu.v12n3.p718-722.
M. Mellyzar, M. Muliani, N. Novita, and I. Kaniawati, “Students’ Development of Collaboration and Communication Skills in Science Classrooms Using Socio-Scientific Issues,” International Journal of Research in Education and Science, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 216–232, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.46328/ijres.1298.
Z. F. Chaerunisa, M. Ramli, and B. Sugiharto, “Students’ inquiry skills progression based on STEM approach and inquiry lab,” Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 206–216, 2023, doi: 10.24057/jpbi.v9i2.25698
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Fajri, Muhiddin Palennari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















