Auto Pintar atau Auto Malas? Studi tentang Literasi AI, Pengambilan Keputusan, dan Performa Akademik Mahasiswa

Ni Komang Ayu Diah Ambalika; Hurul A’ini Sekar Azzahra; Mariyam Mariyam; Jauza Maylia Suhendro

doi:10.31004/riggs.v4i3.2222

Authors

Ni Komang Ayu Diah Ambalika Universitas Udayana
Hurul A’ini Sekar Azzahra Politeknik Hasnur
Mariyam Mariyam Politeknik Hasnur
Jauza Maylia Suhendro Universitas Primakara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i3.2222

Keywords:

Kecerdasan Buatan, Literasi AI, Penggunaan AI Yang Berkelanjutan, Performa Akademik, Kemalasan Manusia, Pengambilan Keputusan

Abstract

Dalam era kemajuan teknologi, kecerdasan buatan (AI) menjadi kekuatan transformatif yang mengubah berbagaiaspek kehidupan, termasuk pendidikan tinggi. Penelitian inimengeksplorasi dampak literasi AI terhadap penggunaan AI yang berkelanjutan, serta pengaruhnya terhadap kemalasanmanusia, pengambilan keputusan, dan performa akademik di kalangan mahasiswa Generasi Z di Indonesia. Menggunakanpendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), penelitian ini menguji hubungan antar lima variabel utama: literasi AI, penggunaan AI yang berkelanjutan, kemalasan manusia, pengambilan keputusan, dan performa akademik. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa seluruhhipotesis terdukung secara signifikan, termasuk pengaruhpositif literasi AI terhadap penggunaan AI, serta dampakpenggunaan AI terhadap performa akademik, kecenderunganmalas, dan proses pengambilan keputusan. Temuan inimenyoroti perlunya keseimbangan dalam pemanfaatan AI untuk mendukung proses pembelajaran yang etis dan produktif, serta pentingnya pengembangan literasi AI bagimahasiswa untuk memaksimalkan potensi teknologi tanpamengorbankan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan otonomiindividu.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Referensi

Abbas, M., Farooq, A. J., & Tariq, I. K. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Education Technology in Higher Education. 21(10), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7.

Acikgoz, F., Rodrigo, P. V., Fevzi, O., Nikolaos, S. (2023). Consumer engagement with AI-powered voice assistants: A behavioral reasoning perspective. Wiley.

Adiguzel, T., Mehmet, H. K., Fatih, K. C. (2023). Revolutioning education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology. 15(3).

Amoako, G., Omari, P., Kumi, D. K., Agbemabiase, G. C., & Asamoah, G. (2021). Conceptual Framework - Artificial Intelligence and Better Entrepreneurial Decision-making: The Influence of Customer Preference, Industry Benchmark, and Employee Involvement in an Emerging Market. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120604

Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions of and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 89–101.

Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Sharma, A. (2021). The adoption of artificial intelligence in academic libraries: A systematic literature review. The Electronic Library.

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

Cardona, J. L. O. (2024). Decision-making in the selection processes of managerial successors in business families and its influence with the use of cutting-edge technologies such as AI: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Family Business Management. 15(2). 393-417.

Chan. C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 20(38). 1-25.

Dimitriadou, E., & Lanitis, A. (2023). A critical evaluation, challenges, and future perspectives of using artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in smart classrooms. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00231-3

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Ismagilova, E., et al. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002

Danaher, J. (2024). Generative AI and the future of equality norms. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105906

Gursoy, D., Chi, C. G., Lu, L., & Nunkoo, R. (2019). Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008

Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2021). A fresh look at the "judgment and decision making" literature. Management Science, 67(10), 6140-6156. Judgment and Decision Making | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology

Krakauer, D. (2016). Will AI harm us? Better to ask how we’ll reckon with our hybrid nature. Nautilus. http://nautil.us/blog/will-ai-harm-us-better-to-ask-how-well-reckon-withour-hybrid-nature

Li, B., Yu, Q., & Yang, F. (2022). The Effect of Blended Instruction on Student Performance: A Meta- Analysis of 106 Empirical Studies from China and Abroad. Best Evidence in Chinese Education, 10(2), 1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.15354/bece.22.ar018

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

Nguyen, A., Yvonne, H., Belle, D., Xiaoshan, H. (2024). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education. 49(5). 847-864.

Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. 12(22).

Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676-688. Cognitive Offloading: Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Salas-Pilco, S. Z., & Yang, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w

Sarwat. (2018). Is AI making humans lazy? Here’s what UAE residents say. Khaleej Times.

Wang, B., Rau, P. L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42, 1324–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1984800

Wesche, J. S., Hennig, F., Kollhed, C. S., Quade, J., Kluge, S., & Sonderegger, A. (2022). People’s reactions to decisions by human vs. algorithmic decision-makers: The role of explanations and type of selection tests. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 33(2), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2022.2132940

Yu, H., & Guo, Y. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational reform: Current status, issues, and prospects. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1183162. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1183162