Peran E-Procurement Dalam Mengurangi Lead Time Proses Purchase Requisition Ke Purchase Order (Pr–Po) di PT Mega Manunggal

Kholidin Kholidin; Isna Nurhabibah

doi:10.31004/riggs.v5i2.9917

Authors

Kholidin Kholidin Universitas Diponegoro
Isna Nurhabibah Universitas Diponegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i2.9917

Keywords:

E-Procurement, Lead Time, Purchase Requisition, Purchase Order, Procurement

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis implementasi e-procurement dalam proses Purchase Requisition hingga Purchase Order (PR–PO), perannya dalam mengurangi lead time pengadaan, serta faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan keterlambatan proses PR–PO di PT Mega Manunggal Property Tbk. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara mendalam, dan dokumentasi dengan informan yang terdiri atas Lead Department Procurement, Supervisor Procurement, dan Staff Procurement. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa e-procurement telah diterapkan pada sebagian besar tahapan pengadaan, mulai dari pengajuan Purchase Requisition, proses persetujuan, pengiriman Request for Quotation, evaluasi penawaran vendor, negosiasi, hingga penerbitan Purchase Order. Implementasi sistem berperan dalam mempercepat distribusi dokumen, mendukung approval secara digital, menyediakan informasi secara real-time, serta mengintegrasikan data procurement dalam satu platform terpusat. Dari 538 transaksi pada periode Mei–Oktober 2025, sebanyak 348 transaksi diselesaikan tepat waktu dan 190 transaksi mengalami keterlambatan. Temuan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa sistem telah mendukung efisiensi, transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan kemudahan monitoring, tetapi manfaatnya belum sepenuhnya optimal. Keterlambatan masih dipengaruhi oleh lambatnya approval, ketidaklengkapan data PR, respons vendor dalam memberikan quotation, keterbatasan ketersediaan barang, ketidaksesuaian spesifikasi, serta kendala teknis sistem. Oleh karena itu, peningkatan kualitas data pengadaan, penguatan disiplin approval, pengembangan sistem, dan koordinasi vendor diperlukan untuk menurunkan lead time secara berkelanjutan. Langkah tersebut diharapkan memperkuat konsistensi pencapaian SLA dan keberlanjutan kinerja procurement perusahaan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. A. Setyadi, S. E. Prianto, S. Pawirosumarto, and S. Ismail, “Factors Influencing the Implementation of E-Procurement with Perceptions of Ease of Use as Mediation Variables,” Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 844–857, Dec. 2023.

2. I. T. Charnor and E. K. Quartey, “Electronic Procurement Adoption and Procurement Performance: Does Institutional Quality Matter?,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1783–1807, 2024.

3. K. Hardinata and M. Sibarani, “Analysis of System Quality Factors & Information Quality with Mediation Variables of Ease of Use To the Success of PT XYZ's E-Procurement,” Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, vol. 4, no. 11, Nov. 2024

4. E. Effendi, D. A. Rahman, and D. P. Riau, “Implementasi Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Melalui E-Procurement di Kabupaten Gayo Lues, Provinsi Aceh,” Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 600–608, 2024.

5. C. Junaedi, Y. Anggriani, S. Abillah, and R. P. Sari, “Dampak Kebijakan E-Catalogue Tahun 2023 terhadap Pola Pengadaan Obat di RSUD dr. Dradjat Prawiranegara,” JFL: Jurnal Farmasi Lampung, vol. 13, no. 1, 2025.

6. M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2014.

7. S. Nandankar and A. Sachan, “Electronic Procurement Adoption, Usage and Performance: A Literature Review,” Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 515–535, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-02-2020-0031.

8. I. Masudin, G. D. Aprilia, A. Nugraha, and D. P. Restuputri, “Impact of E-Procurement Adoption on Company Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Industry,” Logistics, vol. 5, no. 1, art. 16, 2021, doi: 10.3390/logistics5010016.

9. H. Lorentz, A. Aminoff, R. Kaipia, and J. S. Srai, “Structuring the Phenomenon of Procurement Digitalisation: Contexts, Interventions and Mechanisms,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 157–192, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2020-0150.

10. J. Hallikas, M. Immonen, and S. Brax, “Digitalizing Procurement: The Impact of Data Analytics on Supply Chain Performance,” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 629–646, 2021, doi: 10.1108/SCM-05-2020-0201.

11. R. Charpin, M. K. Lee, and T. Wu, “Mobile Procurement Platforms: Bridging the Online and Offline Worlds in China’s Restaurant Industry,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 241, art. 108256, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108256.

12. N. L. Hashim, N. Yusof, A. Hussain, and M. Ibrahim, “User Experience Dimensions for E-Procurement: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Information and Communication Technology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 465–494, 2022, doi: 10.32890/jict2022.21.4.1.

13. D. Zissis, “Information Sharing through Digitalisation in Decentralised Supply Chains,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 327, pp. 763–778, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-05105-4.

14. Y. Li, D. Li, Y. Liu, and Y. Shou, “Digitalization for Supply Chain Resilience and Robustness: The Roles of Collaboration and Formal Contracts,” Frontiers of Engineering Management, vol. 10, pp. 5–19, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42524-022-0229-x.

15. M. A. Hoffmann, L. Wetsch, and R. Lasch, “Digitale Lieferantennetzwerke – Einblicke in die Digitalisierungsfortschritte der Beschaffung,” HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, vol. 60, pp. 21–37, 2023, doi: 10.1365/s40702-022-00933-1.