Model Kinerja Belajar Mahasiswa pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Artificial Intelligence: Peran Mediasi Motivasi Belajar dan Analisis SEM-PLS

Masimbangan Sabarina Harlina; Masimbangan Susana Herawati

doi:10.31004/riggs.v5i2.9804

Authors

Masimbangan Sabarina Harlina Universitas Gundarma
Masimbangan Susana Herawati Universitas Gunadarma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i2.9804

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Literasi Digital, Motivasi Belajar, Kinerja Belajar Mahasiswa, SEM-PLS

Abstract

Transformasi digital dalam pendidikan tinggi telah mendorong pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence (AI) sebagai teknologi pendukung pembelajaran. Namun, efektivitas penggunaan AI dalam meningkatkan kinerja belajar mahasiswa masih dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor, termasuk literasi digital dan motivasi belajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Artificial Intelligence dan literasi digital terhadap kinerja belajar mahasiswa dengan motivasi belajar sebagai variabel mediasi. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode survei yang melibatkan 120 mahasiswa perguruan tinggi sebagai responden. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner berbasis skala Likert dan dianalisis menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) dengan bantuan perangkat lunak SmartPLS 4. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Artificial Intelligence berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja belajar mahasiswa (β = 0,335; p = 0,018), literasi digital berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap motivasi belajar (β = 0,335; p = 0,024), serta motivasi belajar berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja belajar mahasiswa (β = 0,327; p = 0,018). Sebaliknya, pengaruh Artificial Intelligence terhadap motivasi belajar dan pengaruh literasi digital terhadap kinerja belajar tidak terbukti signifikan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa motivasi belajar memiliki peran penting dalam menjelaskan hubungan antara faktor teknologi dan kinerja belajar mahasiswa. Penelitian ini memberikan implikasi bagi perguruan tinggi dalam mengoptimalkan pemanfaatan AI, penguatan literasi digital, dan peningkatan motivasi belajar guna mendukung keberhasilan pembelajaran di era transformasi digital.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] . P. A. et al., “DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A BLEND OF SOCIAL SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT, AND POLICY PERSPECTIVES,” Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, vol. 23, no. S5, pp. 2156–2175, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.52152/801549.

[2] S. Samanta and S. Banerjee, “THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON HIGHER EDUCATION: TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS,” The Social Science Review A Multidisciplinary Journal, no. Special, pp. 401–406, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.70096/tssr.250307071.

[3] N. Alkış-Bayhan, “The Digital Transformation of Higher Education,” 2022, pp. 47–62. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9764-4.ch003.

[4] R. Halkhoree, M. Santally, O. Gukhool, and A. P. Murdan, “A Review of the Digital Transformation Landscape in Higher Education Institutions,” in 2024 1st International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Artificial Intelligence (SESAI), IEEE, Jun. 2024, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/SESAI61023.2024.10599412.

[5] S. Padmanabhan, “Digital Transformation in Higher Education,” 2024, pp. 59–69. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-0433-4.ch005.

[6] D. Pal’ová and J. Zoričaková, “Digital Transformation of Higher Education Institutions,” in 2025 MIPRO 48th ICT and Electronics Convention, IEEE, Jun. 2025, pp. 559–564. doi: 10.1109/MIPRO65660.2025.11132039.

[7] L. Chen, P. Chen, and Z. Lin, “Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 75264–75278, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.

[8] M. Ebben and J. S. Murphy, “Theorizing the future of generative AI in education,” Learn. Media Technol., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 305–309, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1080/17439884.2025.2537961.

[9] U. Mittal, S. Sai, V. Chamola, and D. Sangwan, “A Comprehensive Review on Generative AI for Education,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 142733–142759, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3468368.

[10] S. F. Ahmad, Mohd. K. Rahmat, M. S. Mubarik, M. M. Alam, and S. I. Hyder, “Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 22, p. 12902, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132212902.

[11] M. Cloux, D. Monticolo, and R. Bary, “Understanding how to assess the impact of Artificial Intelligence on learning: a systematic review,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 4618–4632, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2468986.

[12] M. Doğan, A. Celik, and H. Arslan, “AI In Higher Education: Risks and Opportunities From the Academician Perspective,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 60, no. 1, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1111/ejed.12863.

[13] M. Sharples, “A systems approach to AI and education in a post-digital world,” Theory Pract., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 483–491, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1080/00405841.2025.2528549.

[14] E. D. L. Evangelista, “Ensuring academic integrity in the age of ChatGPT: Rethinking exam design, assessment strategies, and ethical AI policies in higher education,” Contemp. Educ. Technol., vol. 17, no. 1, p. ep559, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/15775.

[15] L. V. Mulaudzi and J. Hamilton, “Lecturer’s Perspective on the Role of AI in Personalized Learning: Benefits, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations in Higher Education,” J. Acad. Ethics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1571–1591, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10805-025-09615-1.

[16] C. DeLuca, L. Volante, and M. Holden, “The AI 3 Model: Future Directions for Artificial Intelligence, Assessment Innovation, and Academic Integrity,” Educational Researcher, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 125–133, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.3102/0013189X251385537.

[17] S. Tejedor, L. Cervi, A. Pérez-Escoda, and F. T. Jumbo, “Digital Literacy and Higher Education during COVID-19 Lockdown: Spain, Italy, and Ecuador,” Publications, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 48, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.3390/publications8040048.

[18] A. KAVAK and V. Gültekin, “Examining the relationship between digital competencies and artificial intelligence literacy of academic librarians in Türkiye,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 52, no. 1, p. 103191, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103191.

[19] A. I. Vodă, C. Cautisanu, C. Grădinaru, C. Tănăsescu, and G. H. S. M. de Moraes, “Exploring Digital Literacy Skills in Social Sciences and Humanities Students,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 2483, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14052483.

[20] G. Kayupova et al., “Understanding Digital Literacy Among University Students in Kazakhstan,” Eur. J. Public Health, vol. 35, no. Supplement_4, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1468.

[21] M. Martínez Vicente, J. M. Suárez Riveiro, and C. Valiente Barroso, “Strategic-motivational profile and academic achievement in primary school students,” Educación XX1, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 141–163, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.5944/educxx1.31852.

[22] P. A. McDermott, M. Mordell, and J. C. Stoltzfus, “The organization of student performance in American schools: Discipline, motivation, verbal learning, nonverbal learning.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 65–76, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.65.

[23] L. Y. Chaw and C. M. Tang, “Exploring the relationship between digital competence proficiency and student learning performance,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 59, no. 1, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1111/ejed.12593.

[24] Z. Yu, “Sustaining Student Roles, Digital Literacy, Learning Achievements, and Motivation in Online Learning Environments during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 4388, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14084388.

[25] O. Nacaroğlu, O. Kızkapan, and H. Demir, “Middle School Students’ Motivations and Learning Competencies in Science: Mediating Role of Digital Literacy,” Psychol. Sch., vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1475–1487, May 2025, doi: 10.1002/pits.23400.

[26] Badarudin, Lalu Parhanuddin, Ahmad Tohri, and Muhammad Suhardi, “The Effect of AI (Artificial Intelligence) in Education on Student Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review,” Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.23887/jlls.v8i1.91141.

[27] Pipin Yulanda and Etty Indriani, “Pengaruh <i>Artificial Intelligence</i> dan Pembelajaran Daring terhadap Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Motivasi dan Minat Mahasiswa,” Jurnal Bisnis Manajemen dan Akuntansi (BISMAK), vol. 5, no. 02, pp. 52–68, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.47701/bismak.v5i01.5146.

[28] F. Huang and A. Derakhshan, “Learning Motivation and Digital Literacy in AI Adoption for Self‐Regulated English Learning,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 60, no. 4, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1111/ejed.70254.

[29] E. R. Dewi and A. A. Alam, “AI Literacy, Digital Self-Efficacy, and Learning Resilience as Predictors of Academic Success Across Urban and Rural Students,” Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), vol. 11, no. 2, p. 60, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.26858/est.v11i2.75877.

[30] L. Chen, P. Chen, and Z. Lin, “Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 75264–75278, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.

[31] H. A. Hamzah, M. S. Abu Seman, and M. Ahmed, “The impact of artificial intelligence in enhancing online learning platform effectiveness in higher education,” Information Development, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 794–810, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1177/02666669251315842.

[32] J. Wang and W. Fan, “The Effectiveness of Technology‐Supported Learning in Improving Students’ Digital Literacy—A Meta‐Analysis of 56 Experimental and Quasi‐Experimental Studies,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 41, no. 6, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1111/jcal.70137.

[33] X. Lin, G. Xu, and B. Xiong, “Artificial intelligence literacy, sustainability of digital learning and practice achievement: A study of vocational college students,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 10, p. e0332175, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332175.