Untangling Stablecoin Price Stability Under Liquidity, Behavioral Contagion, And Flash Loan Vulnerabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i2.9467Keywords:
Stablecoin Architecture, Market Sentiment, Liquidity Connectedness, Flash Loan Exploits, PLS-SEM, Decentralized FinanceAbstract
The rapid growth of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has strengthened the role of stablecoins as monetary anchors that connect volatile crypto assets with fiat-denominated value. Although conventional financial theory generally associates price stability with the adequacy of collateral and market liquidity, recent episodes of depegging demonstrate that stablecoin resilience is also shaped by behavioral contagion and technology-based vulnerabilities. This study develops an integrative empirical framework to examine the simultaneous effects of physical liquidity and market sentiment on stablecoin price stability while incorporating Flash Loan Attacks as a structural moderating mechanism. A quantitative explanatory design is employed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and 1,095 daily observations covering the 2021-2023 period. The model evaluates direct relationships and interaction effects through Moderated Regression Analysis. The results indicate that both physical liquidity and market sentiment significantly support price stability, with market sentiment showing the stronger direct effect. However, the occurrence of Flash Loan Attacks weakens both relationships, demonstrating that cyber-financial exploitation can reduce the protective function of liquidity and intensify behavioral fragility. The model explains 68.6% of the variance in stablecoin price stability, highlighting the joint importance of market structure, investor psychology, and smart-contract security. These findings imply that stablecoin governance should combine adequate liquidity buffers, continuous sentiment monitoring, resilient oracle design, and real-time on-chain risk surveillance rather than relying solely on static collateral ratios.
Downloads
References
[1] J. L. Caton, "Cryptoliquidity: the blockchain and monetary stability," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 227–252, 2020.
[2] Koutsoupakis, "Contagion and stability in cryptocurrency," 2020.
[3] Bullmann et al., "In search for stability in crypto-assets," ECB, 2019.
[4] Sidorenko & Khisamova, "Legal status of stablecoins," 2020.
[5] T. Adrian et al., "Understanding Stablecoins," IMF Departmental Paper Series. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 2025.
[6] M. Hasan, M. A. Naeem, M. Arif, S. J. H. Shahzad, and X. V. Vo, "Liquidity connectedness in cryptocurrency market," Financial Innovation, vol. 8, no. 3, 2022.
[7] G.-J. Wang and X.-Y. Ma, "Are stablecoins truly diversifiers, hedges, or safe havens against traditional cryptocurrencies as their name suggests?," International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 71, p. 101425, 2020.
[8] D. Güler, "The Impact of Investor Sentiment on Bitcoin Returns and Conditional Volatilities during the Era of Covid-19," Journal of Behavioral Finance, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2021.
[9] J. Wang, Y. Liu, and C. Hsu, "A U-shaped relationship between the crypto fear-greed index and price synchronicity," Finance Research Letters, vol. 61, p. 104256, 2024.
[10] Bank of Canada, "Uncollateralized Risk-Free Lending in Decentralized Markets: An Introduction to Flash Loans," Staff Discussion Paper Series, 2025.
[11] K. Qin, L. Zhou, B. Livshits, and A. Gervais, "Attacking the DeFi ecosystem with flash loans for fun and profit," International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, pp. 3-32, 2021.
[12] Y. Cao, C. Zou, and X. Cheng, "Flashot: A snapshot of flash loan attacks in DeFi," Proceedings of the ACM, 2021.
[13] J. J. Fernández, M. Á. E. Fernández, and S. L. N. Alonso, "The asset-backing risk of stablecoin trading: the case of Tether," Economics and Business Review, vol. 10, 2024. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2024.1.1211
[14] L. J. Trautman, B. Elzweig, and N. F. Newman, "The SEC, Fraud, and Crypto Currencies," 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4965035
[15] P. Roy, B. Ghose, P. K. Singh, P. K. Tyagi, and A. Vasudevan, "Artificial Intelligence and Finance: A bibliometric review on the Trends, Influences, and Research Directions," F1000Research, vol. 14, p. 122, 2025. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.160959.1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Pramutadi, Ibnu Khajar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















