Revisiting Triple Helix Collaboration for Rural Empowerment through Appropriate Technology Village Cas

Authors

  • Sri Rahayu Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Jamaluddin Hos Universitas Halu Oleo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i1.8088

Keywords:

Triple Helix Collaboration, Appropriate Technology, Rural Community Empowerment, Village Innovation, Collaborative Rural Governance

Abstract

Rural development increasingly requires collaborative and context-sensitive approaches to transform local economic potential into sustainable community empowerment. However, limited attention has been given to how triple helix collaboration operates in village-level practices, particularly when linked to appropriate technology. This study examines the enactment of triple helix collaboration in rural community empowerment through appropriate technology in Tetehaka Village, Konawe Regency, Indonesia. A qualitative case study approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation involving five purposively selected informants representing key stakeholders. Data were analyzed using an interactive process of reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that although the core actors of the triple helix are present, their interaction remains fragmented, program-based, and insufficiently institutionalized. Appropriate technology has supported productive activities by improving efficiency and enabling basic digital practices; however, its impact is constrained by limited technological capacity, weak mentoring continuity, and insufficient coordination. The study highlights that sustainable rural empowerment depends not only on technology availability or actor presence but on the quality of collaboration, role alignment, and continuity of institutional support. This study contributes by extending triple helix theory into a rural village context and repositioning appropriate technology as an empowerment-oriented socio-technical instrument. It also proposes a context-sensitive collaboration model emphasizing structured coordination and continuous facilitation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adefila, A. O., Ajayi, O. O., Toromade, A. S., & Sam-Bulya, N. J. (2024). Empowering rural populations through sociological approaches: A community-driven framework for development. International Journal of Rural Sociology.

Bernard, J., Steinführer, A., Klärner, A., & Keim-Klärner, S. (2023). Regional opportunity structures: A research agenda to link spatial and social inequalities in rural areas. Progress in Human Geography, 47(1), 103–123.

Carayannis, E., & Eds, D. C. (2012). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. February, 1–17.

Chen, C.-H. S., Liu, G., Roushan, G., & Nguyen, B. (2025). Exploring information technology capabilities from multiple aspects of the resource-based theory. Information Systems Frontiers, 27(3), 1013–1043.

de Lima Figueiredo, N., Fernandes, C. I., & Abrantes, J. L. (2023). Triple helix model: Cooperation in knowledge creation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2), 854–878.

Fitriana, A. N., Wijaya, A. F., Wanto, A. H., & Anantanatorn, A. (2025). Multi Helix Collaboration Model as A Policy Instrument of Tourism Village Policy in Pujon Kidul Tourism Village. Journal of Local Government Issues, 8(2).

Gone, J. P. (2021). Decolonization as methodological innovation in counseling psychology: Method, power, and process in reclaiming American Indian therapeutic traditions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 259.

Imaduddin, F., & Firdaus, M. (2025). Bridging the Digital Divide: Theoritical Perspectives on ICT Integration in Indonesian Education Policy. International Journal Of Education, Social Studies, And Management (IJESSM), 5(2), 895–908.

Karta, N. L. P. A. (2022). Community involvement in packaging innovation ensuring the sustainability of destination. International Journal of Social Science and Business.

Kosasih, A., & Sulaiman, E. (2024). Digital transformation in rural settings: Unlocking opportunities for sustainable economic growth and community empowerment. Journal of Sustainable Tourism and Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 129–143.

Leydesdorff, L. (2020). Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. In Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 2356–2364). Springer.

Martins, J. T., & Hukampal Singh, S. (2023). Boundary organisations in regional innovation systems: traversing knowledge boundaries for industry 4.0 regional transformations. R&D Management, 53(3), 364–390.

MASTIKA, I. K., KHRISTIANTO, W., OKTAWIRANI, P., HUTAMA, P. S., & AKBAR, M. N. A. L. H. (2025). BEYOND FORMAL DUTIES: HOW ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOUR DRIVES COMMUNITY-BASED TOURISM IN RURAL INDONESIA. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(1-March), 96–104.

Monda, A., Feola, R., Parente, R., Vesci, M., & Botti, A. (2023). Rural development and digital technologies: A collaborative framework for policy-making. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(3), 328–343.

Natário, M. M., Pedro Almeida Couto, J., & Fernandes Roque de Almeida, C. (2012). The triple helix model and dynamics of innovation: a case study. Journal of Knowledge-Based Innovation in China, 4(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561411211208758

Nipo, D. T., Lily, J., Fabeil, N. F., & Jamil, I. A. A. (2024). Transforming rural entrepreneurship through digital innovation: A review on opportunities, barriers and challenges. J. Mgmt. & Sustainability, 14, 114.

Nordberg, K., Mariussen, Å., & Virkkala, S. (2020). Community-driven social innovation and quadruple helix coordination in rural development. Case study on LEADER group Aktion Österbotten. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 157–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.001

Nowak, P. (2024). Empowering Rural Resilience: Unleashing Innovation for Sustainable Futures.

Nwaichi, P. I., Olayiwola, A., Egbe, T. I., Agi, A., Halilu, A., & Nwaichi, E. O. (2024). Future of triple helix in Nigeria: emerging trends and opportunities in University-Industry-Government collaboration. Triple Helix Nigeria SciBiz Annual Conference, 3–25.

Olsen, M. M. (2021). An academic lead in developing sustainable Arctic communities: Co-creation, quintuple helix, and open social innovation. In Renewable Economies in the Arctic (pp. 123–148). Routledge.

Pawitan, G., Lesmono, D., Aritonang, K., & Diyanah, M. C. (2025). Empowering rural communities through strengthening village-owned enterprises (BUMDes) for sustainable socioeconomic development: A case study of Mekarsari Village, Garut Regency. Society, 13(1), 256–274.

Prasetyo, A., Putri Harwijayanti, B., Ikhwan, M. N., Lukluil Maknun, M., & Fahlevi, M. (2022). Interaction of internal and external organizations in encouraging community innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 903650.

Rahman, M. A., & Jyoti, S. N. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review of User-Centric Design In Digital Business Systems: Enhancing Accessibility, Adoption, And Organizational Impact. Review of Applied Science and Technology, 1(04), 1–25.

Rares, J. J., Mamentu, M., & Londa, V. Y. (2023). Enhancing the management and sustainability of village-owned enterprises (bumdes): a comprehensive analysis of key strategies for implementation. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(12), e2360–e2360.

Ridhowati, R. (2024). The Role of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDES) in Local Economic Empowerment: Analysis and Recommendations. Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 3(11), 4480–4489.

Sianipar, C. P. M., Yudoko, G., Adhiutama, A., & Dowaki, K. (2013). Community Empowerment through Appropriate Technology: Sustaining the Sustainable Development. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 1007–1016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.120

Suazo-Galdames, I. C., Saracostti, M., & Chaple-Gil, A. M. (2025). Scientific evidence and public policy: a systematic review of barriers and enablers for evidence-informed decision-making. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1632305.

Sun, Y., Tan, C., Lim, K. H., Liang, T., & Yeh, Y. (2024). Strategic contexts, strategic orientations and organisational technology adoption: A configurational approach. Information Systems Journal, 34(4), 1355–1401.

Supriadi, A., Permana, I., Afandi, D. R., Arisondha, E., & Kusumaningsih, A. (2025). The triple helix model: university-industry-government collaboration and its role in smes innovation and development. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1(9), 75–90.

Tandon, N., & Sarin, V. (2025). Importance of triple helix in building knowledge economy: A systematic literature review. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 15(1).

Teixeira, G. F. G., Szejka, A. L., & Júnior, O. C. (2025). Innovation Helix Models: Theory, Practice, and Emerging Trends. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 73, 374–389.

Xu, K., Wen, S., Duan, K., & Hua, W. (2025). Exploring the Impact Mechanism on Collaborative Governance of Urban–Rural Integrated Development in the Yangtze River Delta Region. Land, 14(12), 2393.

Yoganandham, G. (2024). RURAL TRANSFORMATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN CONTEMPORARY TAMIL NADU: DYNAMICS, CHALLENGES, AND PERSPECTIVES. Degrés, 9(3).

Yu, Y., Appiah, D., Zulu, B., & Adu-Poku, K. A. (2024). Integrating rural development, education, and management: Challenges and strategies. Sustainability, 16(15), 6474.

Zadegan, M. G., Ghazinoory, S., & Nasri, S. (2025). The triple helix model of innovation and sustainable development goals: a literature review. Sustainable Development, 33, 1482–1497.

Downloads

Published

24-04-2026

How to Cite

[1]
S. Rahayu and J. Hos, “Revisiting Triple Helix Collaboration for Rural Empowerment through Appropriate Technology Village Cas”, RIGGS, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14632–14641, Apr. 2026.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>