Dampak Kepemimpinan Strategis terhadap Keberhasilan Strategi Bisnis dengan Turbulensi Lingkungan sebagai Variabel Moderasi

Nurhaeni Sikki; Leni Nuraeni HR; Rezki Utami Putri; Novita Purnama Rifa

doi:10.31004/riggs.v5i1.7748

Authors

Nurhaeni Sikki Universitas Sangga Buana
Leni Nuraeni HR Universitas Sangga Buana
Rezki Utami Putri Universitas Sangga Buana
Novita Purnama Rifa Universitas Sangga Buana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i1.7748

Keywords:

Strategic Leadership, Business Strategy Success, Environmental Turbulence, Moderation, trategic Management

Abstract

This study examines the effect of strategic leadership on business strategy success, with environmental turbulence as a moderating variable. In an increasingly dynamic and competitive business environment, organizations must adapt quickly to changes in technology, market conditions, and competition. Strategic leadership plays a critical role in ensuring that organizational strategies are effectively formulated and implemented to achieve sustainable competitive advantage. This research adopts a quantitative approach with an explanatory design. Data were collected through structured questionnaires distributed to managers, supervisors, and employees involved in strategic decision-making. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling, with respondents selected based on specific criteria, including a minimum of one year of work experience and involvement in strategy implementation. Data analysis was conducted using Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) to test both direct and interaction effects. The results indicate that strategic leadership has a significant positive effect on business strategy success. Additionally, environmental turbulence significantly moderates this relationship, strengthening the influence of strategic leadership under conditions of high uncertainty and rapid change. This finding suggests that the role of strategic leadership becomes more critical as environmental complexity increases. In conclusion, organizations are encouraged to develop adaptive and responsive leadership capabilities to effectively navigate turbulent environments and enhance strategic outcomes. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the importance of environmental turbulence in shaping the effectiveness of strategic leadership.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Daft, R. L. (2018). Organization Theory and Design (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393080

Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. Oxford University Press.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Hill, C. W. L. (2020). International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2005). Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2005.19417908

Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.

Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78–93.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior (17th ed.). Pearson Education.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Waldman, D. A., Javidan, M., & Varella, P. (2004). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: A new application of upper echelons theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.013

Wheelen, T. L., Hunger, J. D., Hoffman, A. N., & Bamford, C. E. (2018). Strategic Management and Business Policy: Globalization, Innovation, and Sustainability (15th ed.). Pearson.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.

Volberda, H. W., Morgan, R. E., Reinmoeller, P., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2011). Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalization. Global Strategy Journal, 1(1–2), 3–17.

Al-Hakim, L., & Hassan, S. (2016). Core requirements of knowledge management implementation, innovation, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(1), 109–124.