Pengaruh Modal Intelektual, Kolaborasi, Inovasi terhadap Kinerja Organisasi berbasis Analisis SEM PLS

Lukmanul Hakim; Sawir Rifatullah Akil; Surtika Ayumida; Ratnawati Ratnawati

doi:10.31004/riggs.v5i1.6535

Authors

Lukmanul Hakim Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1338-8967
Sawir Rifatullah Akil Institut Teknologi Bisnis dan Administrasi Al Gazali Barru
Surtika Ayumida Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Ratnawati Ratnawati Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i1.6535

Keywords:

Inovasi, Kinerja Organisasi, Kolaborasi, Modal Intelektual, Organisasi Perangkat Daerah, SEM PLS

Abstract

Era desentralisasi dan reformasi birokrasi menuntut Organisasi Perangkat Daerah (OPD) di Indonesia meningkatkan kinerjanya, namun performa sektor publik masih suboptimal akibat kurang minimnya pemanfaatan aset tak berwujud strategis. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh parsial dan simultan Modal Intelektual, Kolaborasi, dan Inovasi terhadap Kinerja Organisasi OPD di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Metode yang digunakan adalah survei kuantitatif dengan data dikumpulkan dari 215 pemimpin OPD mewakili populasi 1.052 unit, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan Partial Least Squares-StructuralEquation Modeling (SEM PLS) pada SmartPLS 4. Hasilnya membuktikan Modal Intelektual, Kolaborasi, dan Inovasi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap Kinerja Organisasi. Modal Intelektual menunjukkan pengaruh paling dominan, disusul Kolaborasi dan Inovasi. Secara simultan, ketiga variabel independen menjelaskan variasi Kinerja Organisasi sebesar 72,5%. Temuan ini mengonfirmasi model memiliki daya prediksi kuat. Dengan demikian, optimalisasi aset tak berwujud dan praktik kolaboratif adalah krusial untuk meningkatkan kinerja sektor publik. Studi ini berkontribusi memverifikasi Teori Resource-Based View dalam konteks organisasi publik. Penelitian selanjutnya direkomendasikan untuk memasukkan variabel kepemimpinan, budaya organisasi, motivasi kerja, atau dukungan sistem informasi. Selain itu, menguji model serupa pada objek dan lokasi yang berbeda; Mengembangkan model yang lebih kompleks dengan menguji variabel mediasi atau moderasi; Atau, Menguji model pada responden yang bervariasi seperti pimpinan dengan staf, atau masyarakat.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lukmanul Hakim, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

Dr. Lukmanul Hakim, S.I.P., M.M. lulusan Doktor Manajemen, FEB Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung. Saat ini membangun kepakaran di bidang Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (MSDM). Berminat melakukan pengajaran, penelitian dan pengabdian kepada masyarkat terkait topik Manajemen Bisnis khususnya Manajemen SDM, dan Manajemen Strategi; Kewirausahaan khususnya inkubasi bisnis UMKM; dan Metode Penelitian (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Mixed Methods). Riwayat karir sebagai dosen sejak tahun 2009. Saat ini terdaftar sebagai dosen tetap homebase pada Program Studi Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, Fakultas Teknik dan Informatika, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Jakarta. Selain mengajar, aktif sebagai praktisi bisnis mengelola perseroan terbatas yang bergerak di bidang Pengembangan SDM melalui kegiatan konsultasi, seminar, pelatihan, dan pendampingan.

References

H. Prabowo, D. Suwanda, and W. Syafri, Inovasi Pelayanan pada Organisasi Publik. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2022.

Kementerian PANRB, “Laporan Kinerja Kota/Kabupaten Kementerian PANRB,” 2021.

B. K. N. K. R. I. Makassar, “Laporan Pemetaan Jabatan Pelaksana Tahun 2019,” Makassar, 2019.

A. Farah and S. Abouzeid, “The impact of intellectual capital on performance : Evidence from the public sector,” Knowl. Manag. E-Learning, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 225–238, 2017, doi: 10.34105/j.kmel.2017.09.013.

W. Wang and C. Chang, “Intellectual capital and performance in causal models Evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan,” J. Intellect. Cap., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 222–236, 2005, doi: 10.1108/14691930510592816.

G. B. Kamath, “Intellectual Capital and Corporate Performance in Indian Pharmaceutical Industry,” J. Intellect. Cap., vol. 9, pp. 684–704, 2008, doi: 10.1108/14691930810913221.

R. Gadja, “Utilizing Collaboration Theory to Evaluate Strategic Alliances,” Am. J. Eval., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 65–77, 2004, doi: 10.1177/109821400402500105.

A. B. Whitford, S. Lee, T. Yun, and C. S. Jung, “Collaborative Behavior and the Performance of Government Agencies,” Int. Public Manag. J., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 321–349, 2010, doi: 10.1080/10967494.2010.529378.

N. R. Sanders and R. Premus, “IT Applications in Supply Chain Organizations: A Link Between Competitive Priorities and Organizational Benefits,” J. Bus. Logist., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2002.tb00016.x.

W. Tsai, “Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks : Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance,” Acad. Manag., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 996–1004, 2001, doi: 10.2307/3069443.

F. Damanpour, R. M. Walker, and C. N. Avellaneda, “Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations,” J. Manag. Stud., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 650–675, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x.

N. Torugsa and A. Arundel, “Complexity of Innovation in the public sector: A workgroup-level analysis of related factors and outcomes,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 392–416, 2016, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2014.984626.

A. Noruzy, V. M. Dalfard, B. Azhdari, S. Nazari-Shirkouhi, and A. Rezazadeh, “Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 64, pp. 1073–1085, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s00170-012-4038-y.

R. Bougie and U. Sekaran, Research Methods for Business : A Skill-Building Approach, 8th Editio. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2019.

J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed. California, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2022.

Gudono, Analisis Multivariat, Cetakan Ke. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta, 2017.

M. Sarstedt, J. F. Hair, C. Jun-hwa, J. Becker, and C. M. Ringle, “How to Specify , Estimate , and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM PLS-SEM,” Australas. Mark. J., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 197–211, 2019.

N. Zeng, Y. Liu, P. Gong, M. Hertogh, and M. König, “Do right PLS and do PLS right: A critical review of the application of PLS-SEM in construction management research,” Front. Eng. Manag., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 356–369, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s42524-021-0153-5.

L. Hakim, Y. Suryana, Joeliaty, and I. Soemaryani, “The influence of resources , service capabilities and government support on business incubator success : Empirical evidence from Indonesia,” Uncertain Supply Chain Manag., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 2489–2500, 2024, doi: 10.5267/j.uscm.2024.5.020.

J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and R. R. Sinkovics, “The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing,” Adv. Int. Mark., vol. 20, no. 2009, pp. 277–319, 2009.

J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer On Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014.

J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson Ne. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited, 2014.

J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Second Edi. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher, 1988.

W. W. Chin, “The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling,” Mod. Methods Bus. Res., vol. 295, no. 2, pp. 295–336, 1998.

H. Sofyani and A. Khairunisa, “Pengaruh Modal Intelektual terhadap Kinerja Organisasional: Studi pada Konteks Perguruan Tinggi di Indonesia,” E-Jurnal Akunt., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1760–1770, 2021, doi: 10.24843/EJA.2021.v31.i07.p12.

B. Tjahjadi, N. Soewarno, A. A. P. Sutarsa, and J. Jermias, “Effect of intellectual capital on organizational performance in the Indonesian SOEs and subsidiaries: roles of open innovation and organizational inertia,” J. Intellect. Cap., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 423–447., 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2023-0140.

M. Sepuru, I. Musonda, and C. S. Okoro, “An Assessment of Factors Influencing Collaboration Impacts on Organisational Performance: A Review,” in Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation., Cham, Switzerland: Publisher Name Springer, 2021, pp. 321–325. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-48465-1_54.

J. M. Assbeihat, “The Impact of Collaboration among Members on Team ’ s Performance,” Manag. Adm. Sci. Rev., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 248–259, 2016.

D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen., “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509–533, 1997, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.

F. Elloumi, “The Effects of Innovation on Organizational Performance,” Int. J. Nov. Res. Econ. , Financ. Manag., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1–10, 2025.

C. Zhu, A. Isaac, and N. N. K. Edmund, “Innovation and organizational performance : A perspective among Chinese enterprises,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. November, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.927617.

M. Tajpour, E. Hosseini, and A. Salamzadeh, “The effect of innovation components on organisational performance : case of the governorate of Golestan Province,” Int. J. Public Sect. Perform. Manag., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 817–830, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2020.110987.