Evaluasi Program Pelatihan dan Pengembangan Karir terhadap Peningkatan Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan di Pabrik Garmen

Yulia Yurlina Zai

doi:10.31004/riggs.v5i2.6509

Authors

Yulia Yurlina Zai Universitas PGRI Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i2.6509

Keywords:

Pelatihan, Pengembangan Karir, Produktivitas Kerja, Industri Garmen

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi pengaruh program pelatihan dan pengembangan karir terhadap peningkatan produktivitas kerja karyawan pada pabrik garmen. Industri garmen memiliki karakteristik padat karya, target produksi yang ketat, variasi keterampilan operator, serta tuntutan kualitas dan ketepatan pengiriman yang tinggi. Kondisi tersebut menempatkan pengembangan sumber daya manusia sebagai faktor penting dalam menjaga efisiensi dan daya saing perusahaan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain deskriptif dan asosiatif. Populasi penelitian berjumlah 1.100 karyawan, sedangkan sampel ditetapkan sebanyak 293 responden menggunakan rumus Slovin dan teknik purposive sampling berdasarkan masa kerja, pengalaman mengikuti pelatihan, serta status keaktifan karyawan. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner, wawancara, dan observasi, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif, uji validitas dan reliabilitas, uji asumsi klasik, regresi linear berganda, uji t, uji F, dan koefisien determinasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa program pelatihan yang relevan dengan kebutuhan pekerjaan membantu meningkatkan keterampilan teknis, ketepatan proses, kemampuan memecahkan masalah, dan konsistensi kualitas hasil produksi. Pengembangan karir melalui jalur promosi yang jelas, penilaian kinerja yang objektif, mentoring, dan kesempatan peningkatan kompetensi turut memperkuat motivasi serta komitmen karyawan. Secara simultan, program pelatihan dan pengembangan karir memberikan kontribusi positif terhadap produktivitas kerja. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya evaluasi pelatihan secara berkelanjutan dan penyelarasan kebijakan karir dengan kebutuhan kompetensi, target produksi, serta strategi perusahaan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163505

2. Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice (15th ed.). Kogan Page.

3. Arthur, W., Jr., Bennett, W., Jr., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003). Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.234

4. Babbitt, L. G. (2016). Supervisory skills training: Impact evaluation (Better Work Discussion Paper No. 22). International Labour Organization.

5. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x

6. Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1065–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352880

7. Brown, D. K., Dehejia, R., & Robertson, R. (2018). The impact of Better Work: Firm performance in Vietnam, Indonesia and Jordan (Better Work Discussion Paper No. 27). International Labour Organization.

8. De Vos, A., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Akkermans, J. (2020). Sustainable careers: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, 103196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.06.011

9. Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management (16th ed.). Pearson.

10. Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Prasad, J. (2018). Transfer of training: The known and the unknown. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104443

11. Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 26 (10th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

12. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.

13. Hoffner, L. A., & Andersson, S. (2021). Productivity interventions available to garment factories in Asia: A mapping study. International Labour Organization.

14. International Labour Organization. (2019). Securing the competitiveness of Asia's garment sector: A framework for enhancing factory-level productivity. ILO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.

15. International Labour Organization. (2022a). Employment, wages and productivity in the Asian garment sector: Taking stock of recent trends. International Labour Organization.

16. International Labour Organization. (2022b). Productivity and decent work: A workers' manual. International Labour Organization.

17. International Labour Organization. (2023). Women leaders at garment sector improve their leadership skills for better productivity. Better Work Indonesia.

18. Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation. Association for Talent Development.

19. Noe, R. A. (2020). Employee training and development (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

20. Saks, A. M., & Burke-Smalley, L. A. (2014). Is transfer of training related to firm performance? International Journal of Training and Development, 18(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12029

21. Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661

22. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

23. Syverson, C. (2011). What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326–365. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.2.326