The Role of Psychological Capital and Leader Member Exchange in Employee Job performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.5780Keywords:
Psychological Capital, Leader–Member Exchange, Job PerformanceAbstract
Kinerja karyawan merupakan faktor kunci dalam pencapaian kinerja organisasi, khususnya pada perusahaan jasa yang bergantung pada kualitas perilaku kerja karyawan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji peran psychological capital sebagai faktor individu dan leader–member exchange (LMX) sebagai faktor lingkungan terhadap job performance karyawan PT EFG. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain survei. Partisipan penelitian berjumlah 539 karyawan yang berasal dari kantor pusat dan tujuh region PT EFG di Indonesia. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ), LMX Multidimensional Measure (LMX-MDM), dan Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ). Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dengan pendekatan covariance-based melalui perangkat lunak AMOS. Hasil confirmatory factor analysis menunjukkan bahwa seluruh konstruk memiliki validitas dan reliabilitas yang baik serta model pengukuran memenuhi kriteria goodness of fit. Pengujian model struktural menunjukkan bahwa psychological capital berperan positif dan signifikan terhadap job performance (β = 0,562; p < 0,01), demikian pula leader–member exchange yang juga berperan positif dan signifikan terhadap job performance (β = 0,176; p < 0,01). Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa peningkatan kinerja karyawan dipengaruhi oleh integrasi antara sumber daya psikologis individu dan kualitas hubungan pemimpin–karyawan. Penelitian ini memberikan implikasi praktis bagi organisasi untuk mengembangkan intervensi penguatan psychological capital dan kualitas kepemimpinan guna mendorong kinerja karyawan secara berkelanjutan.
Downloads
References
Satisfaction, Turnover Intentions, and Performance. Journal of Management, 40(7), 1813–1830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455243
DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000085
Donaldson, S.I., Lee, J.Y. & Donaldson, S.I. Evaluating Positive Psychology Interventions at Work: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Appl Posit Psychol 4, 113–134 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-019-00021-8
Bakker, A. B., & Van Woerkom, M. (2018). Strengths use in organizations: A positive approach of occupational health. Canadian Psychology, 59(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000120
Ekowati, Y., Firdaus, M., & Sulaksono, H. (2024). Assessing Employee Performance Based on Human Resource Quality and Technology Utilization. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56070/ibmaj.2024.047
Forza, C., & Filippini, R. (1998). TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: A causal model. International Journal of Production Economics, 55(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00007-3
Furr, M. R., & Bacharach, V. R. (2013). Psychometric: An Introduction (2nd ed.). SAGE Publisher.
Gazi, M. A. I., Yusof, M. F., Islam, M. A., Amin, M. Bin, & Senathirajah, A. R. bin S. (2024). Analyzing the impact of employee job satisfaction on their job behavior in the industrial setting: An analysis from the perspective of job performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100427
Ghazali, I. (2017). Model Persamaan Struktural dengan AMOS 24 (Edisi 7). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit Indice in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspecification. Psychological Methdos, 3(4), 424–453.
Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. G. L. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.004
Krijgsheld, M., Tummers, L. G., & Scheepers, F. E. (2022). Job performance in healthcare: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07357-5
Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav, 4, 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis to the Study of Self-Concept. First- and Higher Order Factor Models and Their Invariance Across Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
Martin, R., Thomas, G., Guillaume, Y., Lee, A. & Epitropaki, O. (2016).Leader-member Exchange (LMX) and Performance: A Meta-analytic Review. Personnel Psychology, 69, 67-121. DOI:10.1111/peps.12100
Patswawati, P., & Arifin, A. L. (2025). The Role of Human Resource Management in Improving Organizational Performance. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 6(4), 752–757. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijms.v6i4.4337
Pichler, S. (2019). Performance appraisal reactions: A review and research agenda. In L. A. Steelman & J. R. Williams (Eds.), Feedback at work (pp. 75–96). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30915-2_5
Platania, S., Morando, M., Gruttadauria, S. V., & Koopmans, L. (2024). The Individual Work Performance Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14010004
Sackett, P., & Rotundo, M. (2002). The Relative Importance of Task, Citizenship, and Counterproductive Performance to Global Ratings of Job Performance: A Policy-Capturing Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66
Wahyuni, D., Zamora, R., & Hakim, L. (2025). EMPLOYEE OUTPUT, ABSENTEEISM, AND TURNOVER A CASE STUDY IN MECHANICAL CORPORATION. In Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE (Vol. 8, Issue 3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v8i3.6751
Yao, J., Qiu, X., Yang, L., Han, X., & Li, Y. (2022). The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Job Performance: Psychological Capital as a Moderating Factor. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.729131
Zakly Raka Agda, S., Utomo, P., & Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pemuda, S. (2025). ANALISIS KINERJA KARYAWAN DALAM MENINGKATKAN PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA DI USAHA JASA SERVICE AC (BERSAUDARA). 9(3), 2025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v9i3.6402
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khairina Widya Primandari Haryono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















