Improving the Work Effectiveness of Textile Export Agents in Addressing Operational Barriers: A Qualitative Case Study

Maylavalaza Pamela; Gatot Kustyadji; Aditya Narendra Wardhana; Bambang Tutuko

doi:10.31004/riggs.v4i4.5714

Authors

Maylavalaza Pamela Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia
Gatot Kustyadji Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia
Aditya Narendra Wardhana Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia
Bambang Tutuko Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.5714

Keywords:

Textile Export Agent, Operational Barriers, Work Effectiveness, Contractual Governance, Supply Chain Digitalization

Abstract

The decline in textile exports and the increasing complexity of supply chains have intensified operational challenges for small-scale textile export agents. This study aims to identify key operational barriers affecting work effectiveness and to formulate improvement strategies based on practitioners' experiences. A qualitative single-case study was conducted at a privately owned textile export company in Indonesia (Company X). Data were collected through in-depth interviews with two key informants and triangulated with managerial perspectives, limited observation, and document analysis. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's framework. The findings reveal five interrelated operational barriers: quality inconsistencies and repeated sample revisions; production and delivery delays; weak contractual governance; fragile coordination and communication systems; and psychological pressure arising from export agents' intermediary role. These barriers reduce work effectiveness in terms of quality, speed, dependability, flexibility, and cost. The study proposes three improvement strategies: strengthening contractual governance and sanctions, adopting simple digital systems for coordination and monitoring, and enhancing supplier capacity and quality control, supported by leadership involvement. This study contributes to the governance and coordination literature by highlighting the operational realities of small-scale export agents in developing countries and emphasizing the importance of transitioning from informal, manual practices to structured, digitalized operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Ali and M. Haseeb, “Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology as a strategic tool towards higher performance of supply chain operations in textile and apparel industry of Malaysia,” Uncertain Supply Chain Management, pp. 215–226, 2019, doi: 10.5267/j.uscm.2018.10.004.

A. Alsheyadi, A. Baawain, and M. R. Shaukat, “E-supply chain coordination and performance impacts: An empirical investigation,” Production & Manufacturing Research, vol. 12, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/21693277.2024.2379942.

Ariedera, “Peran kepemimpinan adaptif pada transformasi digital organisasi,” Jurnal Manajemen, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 162–165, 2025.

S. Aslam and M. R. Kusumastuti, “The effect of contractual governance, relational governance, and supply chain technology on tacit knowledge,” Journal of Supply Chain Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2025.

M. Bi, G. Chen, D. M. Tilbury, S. Shen, and K. Barton, “A model-based multi-agent framework to enable an agile response to supply chain disruptions,” 2022.

V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.

V. Chhotray and G. Stoker, Governance Theory and Practice: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2018.

M. F. Devianes and A. N. Adi, “Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan situasional, beban kerja, dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan,” Jurnal Kewirausahaan dan Inovasi, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 428–437, 2022, doi: 10.21776/jki.2022.01.4.06.

N. Diana et al., Analisis Data Kualitatif: Problematika dan Solusinya. Malang, Indonesia: Selaras Publishing, 2023.

“Toward competitiveness and MSMEs: Supply chain digitalization, resilience, and competitiveness,” Journal of Supply Chain Studies, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 175–192, 2024.

R. Faizan and I. Ul Haq, “Role and effectiveness of five-performance indicators in attaining competitive edge,” International Journal of Applied Business and Management Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, 2022.

A. Faturahman et al., “Digital transformation in supply chain for business operational efficiency,” ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2025, doi: 10.34306/abdi.v6i1.1239.

E. M. C. Handijaya, D. S. Kodrat, and T. F. C. W. Sutrisno, “Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of digital transformation,” Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1252–1266, 2024, doi: 10.21776/ub.jam.2024.022.04.20.

P. Held, T. Heubeck, and R. Meckl, “Boosting SMEs’ digital transformation: The role of dynamic capabilities,” Review of Managerial Science, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11846-025-00919-5.

H. Jia and L. Wang, “Introducing entropy into organizational psychology,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.3390/bs14010054.

D. J. Teece, “Business models and dynamic capabilities,” Long Range Planning, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007.

D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509–533, 1997.

Y. Saleh and C. Muraguri, “Knowledge sharing culture and transient competitive advantage,” AJBDS, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 103–113, 2024, doi: 10.70641/ajbds.v1i1.60.

World Trade Organization, Global Value Chains Sectoral Profiles: Textiles and Clothing Industry. Geneva, Switzerland: WTO, 2024.