Pengaruh Fraud Risk Factors dengan pendekatan pentagon terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan

Lodang Prananta Widya Sasana; Jaenal Abidin; I Gede Adi  Indrawan

doi:10.31004/riggs.v5i1.5468

Authors

Lodang Prananta Widya Sasana Universitas Pamulang
Jaenal Abidin Universitas Pamulang
I Gede Adi Indrawan Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i1.5468

Keywords:

Fraud Pentagon, Fraud, Rationalization, Financial Statement Fraud

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of fraud risk factors based on the fraud pentagon approach on financial statement fraud in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The fraud pentagon approach is employed as it provides a more comprehensive analytical framework for identifying the potential occurrence of financial statement fraud. The research sample consists of 14 SOEs listed on the IDX during the 2018–2022 period, selected using a purposive sampling technique. This study utilizes secondary data obtained from companies’ annual reports and financial statements. Panel data regression analysis is applied using EViews 12 as the analytical tool. The independent variables examined include financial stability, ineffective monitoring, government ownership, auditor turnover, director turnover, and managerial ownership, while financial statement fraud serves as the dependent variable. One of the key contributions of this study is the use of government ownership as a proxy for the rationalization element within the fraud pentagon framework, which has been rarely applied in prior studies. The results indicate that, partially, financial stability, government ownership, auditor turnover, and director turnover do not have a significant effect on financial statement fraud. In contrast, ineffective monitoring and managerial ownership are found to have a significant effect. Simultaneously, all independent variables collectively influence financial statement fraud. These findings are expected to contribute theoretically to the development of fraud pentagon literature and provide practical implications for strengthening corporate governance in SOEs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adawiyah, R., Kuntadi, C., & Pramukty, R. (2023). Literature review: pengaruh pengendalian internal, whistleblowing system, dan audit internal terhadap pencegahan kecurangan. Jurnal Economina, 2(6), 1331–1342. https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v2i6.606

Alfina, D. F., & Amrizal, A. (2020). Pengaruh faktor tekanan, peluang, rasionalisasi, kompetensi, dan arogansi terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan. Akuntabilitas, 13(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v13i1.14497

Amalia, H. F., & Triyanto, D. N. (2022). Model Fraud Pentagon Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Pada Indeks IDX30 Tahun 2015-2019. EKOMBIS REVIEW: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 10(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.37676/ekombis.v10i1.1590

Apsari, A. K., & Suhartini, D. (2021). Religiosity as moderating of accounting student academic fraud with a hexagon theory approach. Accounting and Finance Studies, 1(3), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.47153/afs13.1512021

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2019). The ACFE reduces occupational fraud worldwide by empowering anti-fraud professionals with leading-edge training, resources and professional certification. https://www.acfe.com/

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to the nations. https://www.acfe.com/-/media/files/acfe/pdfs/rttn/2022/2022-report-to-the-nations.pdf

Aurellya, F. K., Aulia, D. R., & Ramadhan, I. (2024). Fraud Pentagon Model dan Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 11(3), 35–50.

Aviantara, R. (2019). The BIG 4 role in moderating the detection of fraud pentagon against fraudulent financial reports (study on Indonesian public sector government companies). International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 48(2307–4531), 94–107.

Balagopal, N., & Mathew, S. K. (2024). Exploring the factors influencing information security policy compliance and violations: A systematic literature review. Computers & Security, 104062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.104062

Bangun, D. F. B., Hulu, Y. Y. H., Laia, M., Handayani, P., Rezeki, S. I., Pangga, I. D., & Aliah, N. (2024). Peran Audit Internal Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Fraud. Jurnal Bisnis Mahasiswa, 4(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.60036/jbm.v4i1.art10

Bani-Khalid, T., Alshira’h, A. F., & Alshirah, M. H. (2022). Determinants of tax compliance intention among Jordanian SMEs: A focus on the theory of planned behavior. Economies, 10(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10020030

Bawekes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M. A., & Daat, S. C. (2018). Pengujian teori fraud pentagon terhadap fraudulent financial reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Daerah, 13(1), 114–134.

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement.

Crowe, L. M., Beauchamp, M. H., Catroppa, C., & Anderson, V. (2011). Social function assessment tools for children and adolescents: A systematic review from 1988 to 2010. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(5), 767–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.008

Daresta, T., & Suryani, E. (2022). Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Kolusi Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, 5(2), 342–351.

Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x

Dewi, N. S., Faiza, S. N., & Julian, L. J. (2025). Influence of big data competencies and self-efficacy on detection of financial statement fraud on internal auditors in Indonesia. Management & Accounting Review (MAR), 24(1), 353–381.

Digdowiseiso, K., Subiyanto, B., & Priadi, J. I. (2022). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Fraud):(Studi Empiris Pada Auditor BPK RI di Jakarta Pusat). Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(6), 2621–2627. https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v4i6.874

Felicia, Y. (2022). Faktor Resiko Fraud Terhadap Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan Berdasarkan Theory Fraud Pentagon. Accounthink: Journal of Accounting and Finance, 7(01). https://doi.org/10.35706/acc.v7i01.6189

Grandstaff, J. L., & Solsma, L. L. (2021). Financial statement fraud: a review from the era surrounding the financial crisis. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 13(3), 421–437.

Habib, A., Ranasinghe, D., Wu, J. Y., Biswas, P. K., & Ahmad, F. (2022). Real earnings management: A review of the international literature. Accounting & Finance, 62(4), 4279–4344. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12968

Ikatan Akuntansi Indonesia. (2016). Kerangka Konseptual Pelaporan keuangan. Kerangka Konseptual Pelaporan Keuangan, 1–40. http://iaiglobal.or.id/v03/files/file_berita/ED_Kerangka Konseptual_Web.pdf.

Kementerian BUMN. (2020). Rencana Strategis Kementrian BUMN 2020-2024 (pp. 1–74).

Khairunnisa, N. R., Kuntadi, C., & Pramukty, R. (2023). Pengaruh Sistem Internal Kontrol, Audit Internal Dan Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kecurangan (Fraud) Perbankan. Jurnal Economina, 2(7), 1666–1676. https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v2i7.665

Khamainy, A. H., Ali, M., & Setiawan, M. A. (2022). Detecting financial statement fraud through new fraud diamond model: the case of Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 925–941. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2021-0118

Kristanti, O., & Kuntadi, C. (2022). Literature Review: Pengaruh Audit Forensik, Audit Investigatif, Dan Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1(3), 840–848. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v1i3.295

Listyaningrum, D., Paramita, P. D., & Oemar, A. (2017). Pengaruh Financial Stability, External Pressure, Financial Target, Ineffective Monitoring Dan Rasionalisasi Terhadap Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan (Fraud) Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bei Tahun 2012-2015. Journal Of Accounting, 3(3).

Lotfi, A., Salehi, M., & Lari Dashtbayaz, M. (2022). The effect of intellectual capital on fraud in financial statements. The TQM Journal, 34(4), 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2020-0257

Mandal, A., & S, A. (2025). Preventing financial statement fraud in the corporate sector: insights from auditors. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-02-2023-0101

Milgram, S. (2021). Obediencia a la autoridad: el experimento Milgram. Capitán Swing Libros.

Nuraisyah, R. P., & Setiawati, E. (2024). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud. YUME: Journal of Management, 7(2), 259–269.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2016). POJK No. 29/POJK. 04/2016 tentang Laporan Tahunan Emiten atau Perusahan Publik. Undang-Undang.

Pasaribu, R. B. F., & Kharisma, A. (2018). Fraud laporan keuangan dalam perspektif fraud triangle. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 14(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.21460/jrak.2018.141.299

Putra, Y. P. (2022). Analisis Fraud Pentagon dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan menggunakan Fraud Score Model. EKOMBIS REVIEW: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 10(1), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.37676/ekombis.v10i1.1651

Rahmatika, D. N. (2020). Fraud Auditing Kajian Teoretis Dan Empiris. Deepublish Publisher.

Rahmayuni, S. (2018). Analisis pengaruh fraud diamond terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2013-2016). Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(1).

Ramadhaniyah, R., Meiliana, R., Caniago, I., & Darmawan, J. (2023). Pengaruh Rasionalisasi, Arogansi dan Kolusi terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Darmajaya, 1, 184–191.

Randa, A., & Dwita, S. (2020). Pengaruh Elemen-Elemen Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 2(4), 3405–3418. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v2i4.292

Ressidnarry, L. R. L., & Sjarief, J. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Kebangkrutan, Auditor Spesialisasi Industri dan Corporate Governance terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting. BALANCE: Jurnal Akuntansi, Auditing Dan Keuangan, 18(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.25170/balance.v18i1.2297

Riyanti, E. C., Putri, H. C. W., Artadi, W., & Umar, H. (2019). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Komite Audit Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2016–2018). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan, 2–7. https://doi.org/10.25105/semnas.v0i0.5774

Rusmana, O., & Tanjung, H. (2019). Identifikasi kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan fraud pentagon studi empiris BUMN terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi, 21(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.32424/jeba.v21i4.1545

Sahla, W. A., & Ardianto, A. (2023). Ethical values and auditors fraud tendency perception: testing of fraud pentagon theory. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), 966–982. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2022-0086

Sasongko, N., & Wijayantika, S. F. (2019). Faktor Resiko Fraud Terhadap Pelaksanaan Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Berdasarkan Pendekatan Crownâ€TM s Fraud Pentagon Theory). Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v4i1.7809

Schafer, R. (1973). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. JSTOR.

Shahana, T., Lavanya, V., & Bhat, A. R. (2023). State of the art in financial statement fraud detection: A systematic review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 192, 122527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122527

Siddiq, F. R., & Suseno, A. E. (2019). Fraud pentagon theory dalam financial statement fraud pada perusahaan terdaftar di Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) periode 2014-2017 (Perspektif F-Score Model). Jurnal Nusantara Aplikasi Manajemen Bisnis, 4(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.29407/nusamba.v4i2.13800

Situngkir, N. C., & Triyanto, D. N. (2020). Detecting fraudulent financial reporting using fraud score model and fraud pentagon theory: Empirical study of companies listed in the LQ 45 Index. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 23(3), 373–410. https://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.486

Soneji, P. T. (2022). The fraud theories: Triangle, diamond, pentagon. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 18(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2022.123301

Subedi, S., & Kubickova, M. (2024). Tourists’ compliance with public policy and government trust: An application of protection motivation theory. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 65(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655231182081

Subekti, H., & Kuntadi, C. (2023). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pendeteksian Fraud: Pengalaman Audit, Kompetensi dan Skeptisme Profesionalis (Literature Review Audit). Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Penelitian Terapan, 1(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.38035/jpmpt.v1i1.174

Syafitri, M., Ermaya, H. N. L., & Putra, A. M. (2021). Dampak Corporate Governance, Financial Stability, Dan Financial Target Dalam Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akunida, 7(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.30997/jakd.v7i1.4457

Tuanakotta. (2014). Audit Berbasis ISA. Salemba Empat.

Utami, D. P. W., & Purnamasari, D. I. (2021). The impact of ethics and fraud pentagon theory on academic fraud behavior. Journal of Business and Information Systems, 3(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.36067/jbis.v3i1.88

Wangsih, I. C., Pane, Z. I., Yohana, Y., & Kalbuana, N. (2024). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Covid-19 Dan Jumlah Kas Terhadap Laba Di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 8(1), 2045–2061. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v8i1.3927

WARDHANI, P. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Model Terhadap Persepsi Asset Misappropriation.

wartapemeriksa. (2021). Kasus PT Asabri Rugikan Negara Rp22,78 Triliun. https://wartapemeriksa.bpk.go.id/?p=26308

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(04)00065-X

Yasa, I. B. A., Sukayasa, I. K., & Utami, N. M. M. A. (2023). Perspektif fraud diamond theory: kecurangan laporan keuangan. CV. Intelektual Manifes Media.