Predictive Modeling of Blindness Risk Using RAAB 2016 for Precision Eye Health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4235Keywords:
Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB), Machine Learning, Blindness Prediction, Logistic LASSO, XGBoostAbstract
The Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) surveys provide crucial information for planning and evaluating eye health initiatives, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where data systems are often limited. RAAB results are analyzed to estimate the prevalence of visual impairment and to assess cataract surgical coverage across populations. However, despite their rich individual-level data, RAAB surveys have rarely been explored for predictive modeling that could proactively identify people most vulnerable to blindness. This study sought to address that gap by developing and validating interpretable machine-learning models capable of predicting individuals at the highest risk of avoidable blindness. We used RAAB 2016 data collected from seven provinces across Indonesia, comprising a large and diverse sample of older adults. Two modeling approaches—a calibrated Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm and a Logistic LASSO regression—were trained and evaluated. Both models demonstrated outstanding discrimination (AUC ≈ 0.96) and strong calibration performance (Brier score ≈ 0.02), ensuring that predictions corresponded well to actual outcomes. Key predictors consistently selected across methods included increasing age, presence or absence of lens opacity, self-reported functional difficulty in seeing or mobility, and lack of corrective spectacles. To enhance usability in field settings, we also derived a simplified point-score tool from the LASSO model. Decision-curve analysis confirmed that the model could offer substantial clinical and operational benefit by guiding targeted outreach where resources are limited. Overall, this work highlights predictive analytics as promising extension of the RAAB framework, enabling more precise and efficient public eye health strategies in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
S. R. Flaxman et al., “Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Lancet Glob. Heal., vol. 5, no. 12, pp. e1221–e1234, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5.
“World health statistics 2019: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals.” Accessed: Oct. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565707
D. Pascolini and S. P. Mariotti, “Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010,” Br. J. Ophthalmol., vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 614–618, May 2012, doi: 10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2011-300539.
I. Mactaggart, H. Limburg, A. Bastawrous, M. J. Burton, and H. Kuper, “Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness: Looking back, looking forward,” Br. J. Ophthalmol., vol. 103, no. 11, pp. 1549–1552, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2019-314015.
“RAAB | Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness.” Accessed: Oct. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.raab.world/
M. J. Khoury, G. L. Armstrong, R. E. Bunnell, J. Cyril, and M. F. Iademarco, “The intersection of genomics and big data with public health: Opportunities for precision public health,” PLoS Med., vol. 17, no. 10, p. e1003373, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1003373.
D. S. W. Ting et al., “Deep learning in ophthalmology: The technical and clinical considerations,” Prog. Retin. Eye Res., vol. 72, p. 100759, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.PRETEYERES.2019.04.003.
R. Tibshirani, “Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso,” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. b-methodological, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 267–288, Jan. 1996, doi: 10.1111/J.2517-6161.1996.TB02080.X.
T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System,” Proc. ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min., vol. 13-17-Augu, pp. 785–794, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785.
S. M. Lundberg and S. I. Lee, “A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 2017-Decem, pp. 4766–4775, May 2017, Accessed: Oct. 05, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.07874
R. Poplin et al., “Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning,” Nat. Biomed. Eng., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 158–164, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1038/S41551-018-0195-0;TECHMETA.
S. Keel et al., “Keeping an eye on eye care: monitoring progress towards effective coverage,” Lancet Glob. Heal., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. e1460–e1464, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00212-6.
“UNICEF/ Washington Group on Disability Statistics Child Functioning Module 1,” 2016.
A. J. Vickers and E. B. Elkin, “Decision curve analysis: A novel method for evaluating prediction models,” Med. Decis. Mak., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 565–574, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361.
A. J. Vickers, B. van Calster, and E. W. Steyerberg, “A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis,” Diagnostic Progn. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/S41512-019-0064-7/FIGURES/3.
“Applying ‘Lasso’ Regression to Predict Future Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Patients | IOVS | ARVO Journals.” Accessed: Oct. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2289280
A. J. Vickers and E. B. Elkin, “Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models,” Med. Decis. Mak., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 565–574, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361.
M. J. Burton et al., “The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020,” Lancet Glob. Heal., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. e489–e551, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30488-5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Stepanus Silaban, Putri Ghanim Septia Habiba

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















