Implementasi Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Syariah di Pengadilan Agama

M. Saifuddin; Abdul Hadi; Muridah Isnawati

doi:10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3483

Authors

M. Saifuddin Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Abdul Hadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Muridah Isnawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3483

Keywords:

Sharia Arbitration, Islamic Economic Law, Justice, Religious Courts, Annulment of Decisions

Abstract

This research is motivated by the important role of Religious Courts in maintaining the integrity of Sharia law through the mechanism for annulling Sharia arbitration awards as regulated in Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 1999. Although Sharia arbitration is legally recognized as a final and binding alternative dispute resolution (ADR), judicial oversight is still needed to ensure that arbitration awards do not conflict with the principles of Islamic justice. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of annulling Sharia arbitration awards in Religious Courts and to identify the challenges faced in its implementation. The method used is qualitative research with a juridical-empirical approach, through interviews with seven judges from six work units of the Religious Courts and document studies of related decisions and regulations. The results of the study indicate that cases of annulling Sharia arbitration are still rare due to low public understanding and minimal synergy between BASYARNAS and the Religious Courts. A key finding indicates that judges assess annulments based on formal and material aspects, as well as their compliance with sharia principles, and base their decisions solely on limited reasons as stipulated by law. The implications of this research emphasize the need to improve the capacity of judges and provide public outreach so that this annulment mechanism can function effectively as a means of upholding substantive justice and protecting the values of maqasid al-shari'ah in Islamic economic law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Bakir, “Tanggung Jawab Sosial Dalam Al-Qur’an: Studi Analisis Terhadap Term Al-Islah,” J. Dialogis Ilmu Ushuluddin, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–35, 2021.

S. Q. Nurlina Sari Ihsanniati, M. Nur Gema Ramadhan, Ahmad Yusam Thobroni, Achmad Ainul Yaqin, “Keadilan Sosial: Konsep Keadilan Dan Peran Manusia Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Perspektif Al-Qur’an,” Al-Tadabbur J. Ilmu Quran dan Tafsir, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 181–192, 2024, doi: 10.30868/at.v9i01.6661.

F. L. N. Satrio Novianto, “Pengaruh Penerapan Prinsip- Prinsip Ekonomi Syariah Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Islam,” As-Syirkah Islam. Econ. Finacial J., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.56672/assyirkah.v3i3.252.

F. D. Abdullah, A. Fathonih, and M. Athoillah, “Analisis Kajian Tafsir Ahkam tentang Kedudukan Akad Muamalah pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah di Indonesia,” J. AT-TAHFIDZ J. Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 64, 2021.

A. T. Santriati, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional,” J. Stud. Agama, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 38–54, 2021.

Abdullah, Fadli Daud, et al. ‘Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Murabahah Melalui Metode Al-Shulhu Perspektif Teori Hukum Keadilan Konsensus Jurgen Habermas.’ EL MUDHORIB Учредители: Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Fattahul Muluk Papua 4.2 (2023): 163-173.

Z. N. Rosidah and L. Mahfiana, “Efektifitas Penerapan Prinsip Syariah dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional ( BASYARNAS ),” Tawazun J. Sharia Econ. Law, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–30, 2020.

Abdullah, Fadli Daud. Analisis putusan hakim Pengadilan Agama Cirebon nomor 1/Pdt. GS/2020/Pa. Cn dalam penyelesaian sengketa pembiayaan murabahah perspektif legal system theory Lawrence Meir Friedman. Diss. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2024.

T. B. Sembiring and I. M. Kariyasa, “The Development of National Arbitration Law in Indonesia : Challenges and Prospects in Handling Trade Disputes,” J. Am. Inst., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 639–647, 2025.

E. Ibrahim, “Arbitrase Dalam Perspektif Fikih Dan Penerapannya Dalam Undang-Undang Di Indonesia,” Constituo J. Ris. Huk. Kenegaraan Polit., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 183–197, 2025.

F. N. Raymond Panuturi Siboro, Bonaraja Purba, “Analisis Literatur Tentang Perbandingan Arbitrase Dan Jalur Litigasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis,” J. Ilm. Wahana Pendidik., vol. 11, no. November, pp. 188–196, 2025.

M. J. Washil, “Peran Hukum Islam dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah : Perspektif Teoritis dan Praktis,” J. Pemikir. dan Ilmu Keislam., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 55–70, 2024.

L. J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.

S. A. Wiraguna, “Metode Normatif dan Empiris dalam Penelitian Hukum : Studi Eksploratif di Indonesia,” J. Sos. Polit. Pemerintah. dan Huk., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 57–65, 2024, doi: 10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390.

Rukajat, Ajat. Pendekatan Penelitian Kualitatif Qualitative Research Approach, (Deepublish, 2018), 21.

Rifa’i, M. Anwar. “Reduksi Data, Penyajian Data, dan Penarikan Kesimpulan dalam Penelitian Kualitatif.” STAIDA SUMSEL (2024).

M. Akbar and A. Jais, “Al-Anam : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam Urgensi Alternative Dispute Resolution dalam Perspektif Fatwa MUI dan Regulasi Nasional,” Al-Anam J. Ilmu Pendidik. Islam, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 57–63, 2016.

M. Ulul and A. Musaffa, “Optimalisasi Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Sistem Hukum Indonesia : Studi Komparatif antara Litigasi dan Alternative Dispute Resolution ( ADR ),” Az Zarqa, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 261–281, 2016.

Pratiwi, Dian, Risti Aminin, and Mohd Winario. ‘Arbitrase Islam Dalam Perspektif Syariat Islam.’ Journal of Legal Sustainability 1.3 (2024): 8-15.

Tehedi, “Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional,” J. Islam. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 48–61, 2022.

A. M. Ms, M. Suib, and M. Iqbal, “Solusi Konflik Perekonomian Syari ` ah Melalui Pemberdayaan Badan Albitrase dan Peradilan Agama Islam,” Proceeding Semin. Nas. Politek. Negeri Lhokseumawe, vol. 3, no. 1, 2019.

Rahmi, Diana. ‘Ruang Lingkup Kewenangan Peradilan Agama Dalam Mengadili Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.’ Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 13.2 (2013).

Johari, Elman, Orin Oktasari, and Arista Khairunnisa. Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah. Faaslib Serambi Media, 2025.

Dodi, Gusri Putra, and Mh Sh. Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Prenada Media, 2022.

Andriani, Agustini. ‘Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase dalam Kaitannya dengan Prinsip Final and Binding.’ AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4.1 (2022): 25-36.

Soemitra, Andri. Bank & Lembaga Keuangan Syariah: Edisi Kedua. Prenada Media, 2017.

Sitompul, Muhamad Haris Zulkarnaen, and Teuku Syahrul Ansari. ‘Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Syariah.’ YUSTISI 10.3 (2023): 152-159.

Kurnia, Rahmat, and Yasarman Yasarman. ‘Kekuatan Hukum Putusan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (Bani) Dan Sistem Arbitrase Di Masa Depan.’ IBLAM Law Review 4.3 (2024): 303-315.”.

Muhammad, Isa Aljabar. Keabsahan Pembatalan Perjanjian Perdamaian Arbitrase Oleh Pengadilan (Studi Putusan No. 299/Pdt. G/2023/Pa Sby dan Putusan No. 531/PDT. SUS-ARBT/2023/PN BKS. Diss. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, 2025.