Integrating Resource-Based, External Dependency, Dynamic Capability, and Social Cognitive Perspectives to Explain Organizational Performance in Context of PT Telkom Indonesia

Authors

  • Temi Hudoyo Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
  • Yayan Hendayana Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3453

Keywords:

Resource-Based View (RBV), Resource Dependence Theory (RDT), Dynamic Capabilities, Social Cognitive Theory, Organizational Performance, Digital Transformation, Ecosystem Partnerships, PT Telkom Indonesia, Digital Talent, Leadership Cognition, Capability Renewal

Abstract

The rapid restructuring of the global telecommunications industry toward data-driven digital ecosystems has intensified the strategic relevance of internal resources, interorganizational dependencies, adaptive capability renewal, and managerial cognition as determinants of organizational performance. This conceptual review integrates Firm Performance Theory with the Resource-Based View (RBV), Resource Dependence Theory (RDT), Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT), and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) to construct a multi-level explanatory model suited to organizations undergoing digital transformation. Using PT Telkom Indonesia as contextual grounding, the review demonstrates that organizational performance emerges not solely from the possession of VRIN resources, but from the interaction between resource endowments, dependency governance structures, dynamic capability enactment, and the development of cognitive and learning-based competences. The synthesis argues that Telkom’s performance trajectory in transitioning from legacy telecommunication operations toward integrated digital infrastructure and enterprise platform services is shaped by the simultaneous reinforcement of asset orchestration logic, partnership coordination, strategic sensing and reconfiguration routines, and leadership self-efficacy. The article proposes a circular, mutually constitutive model of performance generation rather than a linear causal sequence, highlighting performance as an evolving outcome of co-aligned strategic mechanisms. Research gaps are identified in cognitive microfoundations of digital transformation in state-owned enterprises, dependency–capability interplay in digital infrastructure ecosystems, and performance measurement adaptations for platform-based business models. A future research agenda is proposed to address these gaps.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alrub, Y. A., Al-Hersh, A. M., & Qubbaj, I. S. (2025). Dynamic capabilities and digital maturity in financial services. Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15010021

Baby, A., Vinod, K., & Thomas, K. (2024). A systematic review of financial performance in the manufacturing industry. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00353-1

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

Bourne, M., Franco-Santos, M., Micheli, P., & Pavlov, A. (2021). Performance measurement and management in a VUCA world. International Journal of Production Research, 59(13), 4159–4167.

Durán, W. F., Castaño, J., & Roldán, J. L. (2022). CEOs’ managerial cognition and dynamic capabilities. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(6), 1221–1241.

Fida, R., et al. (2025). Self-efficacy and non-task performance: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences.

Furnival, A., & Mu, S. (2023). Leadership cognition and strategic renewal in state-owned enterprises. Public Management Review, 25(4), 612–630.

Ghosh, A., & Xin, K. K. (2023). Platform competition and strategic dependency in digital ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113893.

Heubeck, T., & Meckl, R. (2023). A systematic review of dynamic managerial capability research. Review of Managerial Science.

Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.

Hund, A., et al. (2021). Digital innovation: A review and perspective. Journal of Business Research, 129, 902–915.

Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Toward a theory of ecosystems. SMJ, 39(8), 2255–2276.

Liu, Z., et al. (2024). Business vs. platform ecosystem strategy. Inventions, 9(4), 216.

Mura, M., Longo, M., Micheli, P., & Bolzani, D. (2021). PMS uses and ambidexterity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(13), 127–162.

Nambisan, S., et al. (2019). Digital transformation implications. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), 223–238.

Newcastle Open Theories (2025). Dynamic capabilities theory: Updated review.

Plekhanov, D., et al. (2023). Digital transformation research review. International Journal of Information Management, 69, 102646.

Rahman, S. A., et al. (2025). Leveraging dynamic capabilities in digital transformation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(2), 100479.

Richard, P., Devinney, T., Yip, G., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance. Journal of Management, 35, 718–804.

Suri, J., & Martinez, P. (2023). Digital transformation in emerging markets. Telecommunications Policy, 47(5).

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

Telkom Indonesia. (2024). Annual report & investor presentation.

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., et al. (2021). Digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.

Developing Telecoms. (2024). NeutraDC strategic investment and ecosystem partnerships in Indonesia.

Durán, W. F., Castaño, J., & Roldán, J. L. (2022). CEOs’ managerial cognition and dynamic capabilities.

Furnival, A., & Mu, S. (2023). Leadership cognition and strategic renewal in state-owned enterprises.

Ghosh, A., & Xin, K. K. (2023). Platform competition and strategic dependency in digital ecosystems.

Heubeck, T., & Meckl, R. (2023). Dynamic managerial capability research review.

Hund, A., et al. (2021). Digital innovation perspectives.

Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Toward a theory of ecosystems.

Liu, Z., et al. (2024). Business vs. platform ecosystem strategy.

Mura, M., Longo, M., Micheli, P., & Bolzani, D. (2021). PMS and ambidexterity.

Newcastle Open Theories. (2025). Dynamic capabilities updated review.

Plekhanov, D., et al. (2023). Digital transformation review.

Rahman, S. A., et al. (2025). Leveraging dynamic capabilities in transformation.

Reuters. (2024). PT Telkom restructuring and realignment news.

Telkom Indonesia. (2025). Annual report and investor presentation.

journal.pubmedia.id. (2025). Case study of PT Telkom Indonesia digital transformation.

journal.ubm.ac.id. (2025). Digital talent development case study.

e-journal.unair.ac.id. (2025). Human resource digital upskilling initiatives.

Downloads

Published

22-11-2025

How to Cite

[1]
T. Hudoyo and Y. Hendayana, “Integrating Resource-Based, External Dependency, Dynamic Capability, and Social Cognitive Perspectives to Explain Organizational Performance in Context of PT Telkom Indonesia”, RIGGS, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1606–1613, Nov. 2025.