Restorative Justice in Contemporary Criminal Law: Comparative Perspectives and Emerging Trends

Andre  salim; Tomi Apra santosa; Abdul Ghoni; Taqiyuddin  Kadir; Hadion Wijoyo

doi:10.31004/riggs.v4i3.2900

Authors

Andre salim universitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus
Tomi Apra santosa Akademi Teknik Adikarya
Abdul Ghoni STIU Dirosat Islamiyah Al-Hikmah Jakarta
Taqiyuddin Kadir universitas jayabaya
Hadion Wijoyo STIMIK Dharmapala Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i3.2900

Keywords:

Restorative Justice, Contemporary Crime, Comparative Perspective, Global Trends, Criminal Mediation

Abstract

This study analyzes the concept of restorative justice in contemporary criminal law by highlighting comparative perspectives and current trends that are developing in various jurisdictions. Using a qualitative approach based on literature studies, this study searches academic literature, laws and regulations, and international and national court decisions to identify patterns of policy implementation and innovation. The results of the analysis show that restorative justice is increasingly integrated as an alternative to punishment that emphasizes the recovery of victims' losses, perpetrator participation, and social reconciliation, while challenging the dominant retributive paradigm. A comparison of practices in Europe, North America, and Asia shows significant variations in legal frameworks, mediation mechanisms, and institutional support, influenced by cultural and political contexts. In addition, global trends such as the digitization of the mediation process and the involvement of local communities are expanding the scope of restorative justice implementation, but still face challenges related to procedural standards and the protection of the rights of the parties involved. This study recommends strengthening regulations, enhancing facilitator capacity, and cross-border empirical research to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of restorative justice implementation in the modern criminal justice system. These findings are expected to make a theoretical and practical contribution for policymakers, academics, and legal practitioners in designing criminal policies that are more humane and responsive to the needs of society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agnihotri, S., & Veach, C. (2016). Reclaiming restorative justice: An alternate paradigm for justice. CUNY L. Rev., 20(2). https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/nyclr20&section=13%0Ahttps://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1431&context=clr

Beale, S. S. (2005). Still Tough on Crime? Prospects for Restorative Justice in the United States. In SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.358440

Daly, K., & Immarigeon, R. (1998). The Past, Present, and Future of Restorative Justice: Some Critical Reflections. Contemporary Justice Review, 1(1), 21–45.

Freiberg, A. (2011). Post-adversarial and post-inquisitorial justice: Transcending traditional penological paradigms. European Journal of Criminology, 8(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810385434

Goodman, H. (2021). Anti-Carceral Futures: a Comparative Perspective of Restorative and Transformative Justice Practices in the United States and New Zealand. Fordham International Law Journal, 44(5), 1215–1265. https://perma.cc/RRW3-P3X5].

International, A., Access, O., & Journal, P. R. (2025). Multidisciplinary Trends ( IJARMT ) A Critical Evaluation of the Administration of Justice and Theories of Punishment International Journal of Advanced Research and Multidisciplinary Trends ( IJARMT ). 2, 581–591.

Journal, I., Exploring, O. F., & Engineering, T. I. N. (2022). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPLORING EMERGING Peer-Reviewed , Refereed , Indexed and. 2394, 30–39.

King, M. S. (2008). Restorative justice, therapeutic jurisprudence and the rise of emotionally intelligent justice. Melbourne University Law Review, 32(3).

Kumar Singh Asst Professor, S., & Kumar Singh, S. (2025). Revisiting Theories of Punishment in the 21st Century: A Critical Analysis of Retribution, Deterrence, Rehabilitation, and Restorative Justice in Contemporary Legal Systems. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(5), 136–144. www.theinfinite.in

Liu, J., & Palermo, G. B. (2009). Restorative justice and Chinese traditional legal culture in the context of contemporary Chinese criminal justice reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Police & Criminal Justice, 7(1), 49–68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241641464

Luna, E. (2003). Punishment Theory, Holism and the Procedural Conception of Restorative Justice. Utah Law Review, 2003(1), 205.

McAlinden, A. M. (2011). “Transforming justice”: Challenges for restorative justice in an era of punishment-based corrections. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice, 14(4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2011.616369

O’Mahony, D., & Doak, J. (2017). Reimagining Restorative Justice: Agency and Accountability in the Criminal Process. Reimagining Restorative Justice: Agency and Accountability in the Criminal Process, 1–256.

Omale, D. J. O., & Omale, D. J. O. (2006). AFRICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY & JUSTICE STUDIES : JUSTICE IN HISTORY : AN EXAMINATION OF ‘ AFRICAN RESTORATIVE TRADITIONS ’ AND THE EMERGING ‘ RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ’ PARADIGM . J. 2(2), 33–63.

Ramizah Wan Muhammad. (2020). Forgiveness and Restorative Justice in Islam and the West: A Comparative Analysis. ICR Journal, 11(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.52282/icr.v11i2.786

Rossner, M., & Taylor, H. (2024). The Transformative Potential of Restorative Justice: What the Mainstream Can Learn from the Margins. Annual Review of Criminology, 7, 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-040921

Santosa, T. A., Ali, M., Safar, M., Amri, M., Ruchiat, A., & Sjoraida, D. F. (2025). Inquiry-Based Learning and Critical Thinking Skills of Higher Education Students in the Era of Revolution 5 . 0 : A Meta-analysis. CUESTIONES DE FISIOTERAPIA, 54(3), 5156–5166.

Schmid, D. J. (2017). Restorative justice. Advances in Sustainability and Environmental Justice, 21, 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-503020170000021010

Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Colledge, E., Dignan, J., Howes, M., Johnstone, J., Robinson, G., & Sorsby, A. (2006). Situating restorative justice within criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology, 10(4), 505–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480606068876

Sivasubramaniam, D. (2012). A special issue on restorative justice: Unravelling the mystery. Critical Criminology, 20(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-011-9148-6

Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., & Lightfoot, E. (2005). Restorative Justice in the Twenty-First Century: A Social Movement Full of Opportunities and Pitfalls. Marquette Law Review, 89, 251–304.

Wood, W. R., & Suzuki, M. (2016). Four Challenges in the Future of Restorative Justice. Victims and Offenders, 11(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2016.1145610

Wood, W., Suzuki, M., & Hayes, H. (2022). Restorative Justice in Youth and Adult Criminal Justice. In SSRN Electronic Journal (Issue September). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4223856

Zulkifli, Z., Satria, E., Supriyadi, A., & Santosa, T. A. (2022). Meta-analysis: The effectiveness of the integrated STEM technology pedagogical content knowledge learning model on the 21st century skills of high school students in the science department. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 5(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v5i1.144