Dampak Implementasi Sistem Informasi Laboratorium terhadap Efisiensi Waktu Tunggu (Turnaround Time) Pelayanan Rumah Sakit: Sebuah Literature Review

Bertua Novita Ayu; Renny Anggraini; Budi Hartono

doi:10.31004/riggs.v5i2.12100

Authors

Bertua Novita Ayu Universitas Hang Tuah Pekanbaru
Renny Anggraini Universitas Hang Tuah Pekanbaru
Budi Hartono Universitas Hang Tuah Pekanbaru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i2.12100

Keywords:

Sistem Informasi Laboratorium, Laboratory Information System, Turnaround Time, Efisiensi Pelayanan, Rumah Sakit, Literature Review

Abstract

Sistem Informasi Laboratorium (Laboratory Information System/LIS) merupakan salah satu komponen penting dalam transformasi digital pelayanan kesehatan yang berperan dalam meningkatkan efisiensi proses pemeriksaan laboratorium di rumah sakit. Implementasi LIS memungkinkan integrasi data pemeriksaan laboratorium dengan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Sakit (SIMRS), sehingga mempercepat proses registrasi, pengolahan spesimen, validasi hasil pemeriksaan, hingga distribusi hasil kepada tenaga medis. Salah satu indikator utama keberhasilan pelayanan laboratorium adalah turnaround time (TAT) atau waktu tunggu penyelesaian hasil pemeriksaan, karena berpengaruh terhadap kecepatan pengambilan keputusan klinis dan kualitas pelayanan pasien. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak implementasi Sistem Informasi Laboratorium terhadap efisiensi turnaround time pelayanan rumah sakit melalui pendekatan literature review. Metode penelitian menggunakan tinjauan pustaka dengan menganalisis artikel ilmiah nasional dan internasional, pedoman organisasi kesehatan, serta publikasi akademik yang diterbitkan pada periode 2016–2026. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi LIS mampu mempercepat turnaround time melalui otomatisasi alur kerja, integrasi data, serta pengurangan kesalahan administrasi. Berbagai literatur juga menunjukkan bahwa implementasi LIS yang dilakukan melalui tahapan analisis kebutuhan, pengembangan sistem, integrasi dengan SIMRS, pelatihan pengguna, implementasi bertahap, serta evaluasi berkelanjutan memberikan dampak yang lebih efektif terhadap efisiensi pelayanan laboratorium. Kesimpulannya, implementasi Sistem Informasi Laboratorium merupakan strategi yang efektif dalam meningkatkan efisiensi pelayanan laboratorium serta mendukung mutu pelayanan rumah sakit secara berkelanjutan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) – LIS Guidebook. (2019). Laboratory Information System (LIS) Guidebook: A Guidebook for Laboratory Information System (LIS) Implementation to Support Laboratory Strengthening. Association of Public Health Laboratories.

2. Cai, X., et al. (2025). Improving laboratory turnaround time using real-time Laboratory Information System data and Lean Six Sigma methodology. Journal of Medical Systems.

3. College of American Pathologists. (2023). Laboratory General Checklist. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists.

4. Edayan, G., et al. (2024). Software-to-software integration in laboratory information systems: Enhancing interoperability and laboratory efficiency. SoftwareX.

5. Grech, A. (2009). Improving therapeutic turnaround time through laboratory information systems and pneumatic tube systems. University of Malta.

6. He, X., et al. (2024). Laboratory data timeliness and completeness improves through electronic laboratory information systems. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 10, e50407.

7. Justinia, T., & Zawawi, R. (2017). Laboratory information systems and analytical turnaround time. Global Journal of Research and Review, 4(1).

8. Lukić, S. (2017). Laboratory information systems in clinical laboratories: Current status and future perspectives.

9. McPherson, R. A., & Pincus, M. R. (2021). Henry's Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods (24th ed.). Elsevier.

10. Edayan, G., et al. (2024). Integration technologies in laboratory information systems: A systematic review. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 50, 101566.

11. Patel, V., McNamara, L., Dullabh, P., Sawchuk, M. E., & Swain, M. (2017). Variation in interoperability across clinical laboratories nationwide. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 108, 175–184.

12. Vrijsen, B. E., et al. (2022). Association between laboratory turnaround time and emergency department length of stay. BMC Emergency Medicine.

13. Cassim, N., Coetzee, L. M., Glencross, D. K., & Kufa-Chakezha, T. (2020). Assessing the impact of a turnaround time dashboard at a high-volume laboratory. African Journal of Laboratory Medicine.

14. Lukić, V. (2017). Laboratory Information System – Where Are We Today? Journal of Medical Biochemistry, 36(3), 220–224.

15. Oakley, S., et al. (2025). Implementation of a Laboratory Information Management System in resource-limited settings. (Open access, PubMed Central).

16. Plebani, M. (2017). Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: From theory to practice. Clinical Biochemistry.

17. Lippi, G., & Da Rin, G. (2019). Advantages and limitations of total laboratory automation: A personal overview. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 57(6), 802–811.

18. Hawker, C. D. (2017). Laboratory automation: Total and subtotal automation in clinical laboratories. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine.

19. Park, J., et al. (2021). Effect of laboratory information systems on clinical laboratory performance. Healthcare Informatics Research.

20. Alshamrani, M., et al. (2021). Health information systems implementation challenges in hospitals: A systematic review. Healthcare.

21. Yusof, M. M., et al. (2008). An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: Human, Organization and Technology-fit (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics.

22. Wager, K. A., Lee, F. W., & Glaser, J. P. (2022). Health Care Information Systems: A Practical Approach for Health Care Management (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.