Efektivitas dan Tantangan Integrasi Generative AI dalam Kurikulum Pemrograman di Perguruan Tinggi: Sebuah Kajian Literatur Sistematis (SLR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i2.11810Keywords:
Generative AI, Kurikulum Pemrograman, Systematic Literature Review, Pendidikan Tinggi, Penilaian OtentikAbstract
Perkembangan Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) telah membawa perubahan signifikan dalam pembelajaran pemrograman di perguruan tinggi. Kehadiran teknologi berbasis Large Language Models (LLM), seperti ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, dan Google Gemini, memberikan peluang untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran, namun juga memunculkan tantangan terhadap pengembangan kemampuan berpikir algoritmik, integritas akademik, dan sistem evaluasi pembelajaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis efektivitas integrasi Generative AI dalam kurikulum pemrograman, mengidentifikasi tantangan pedagogis dan institusional yang muncul, serta merumuskan model penilaian yang adaptif dan otentik. Penelitian menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan mengadopsi pedoman PRISMA 2020. Literatur diperoleh dari basis data Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, dan Google Scholar dengan rentang publikasi tahun 2021–2026. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik thematic content analysis untuk mengelompokkan temuan berdasarkan efektivitas, tantangan, dan rekomendasi implementasi. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Generative AI mampu meningkatkan efisiensi pembelajaran, mempercepat pemahaman sintaksis, serta memberikan umpan balik secara real-time yang mendukung proses belajar mahasiswa. Namun, penggunaan AI tanpa landasan konseptual yang kuat berpotensi menurunkan kemampuan berpikir algoritmik dan meningkatkan ketergantungan terhadap teknologi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan restrukturisasi kurikulum melalui pendekatan bertahap yang menyeimbangkan pembentukan logika dasar dengan pemanfaatan AI pada pembelajaran lanjutan. Selain itu, penerapan penilaian otentik, seperti viva voce, reverse engineering assessment, dan AI-pair programming exam, menjadi alternatif evaluasi yang lebih relevan untuk mengukur kemampuan penalaran komputasional mahasiswa di era kecerdasan buatan.
Downloads
References
1. Becker, B. A., et al. (2023). Programming Is Hard, and Now the AI Can Do It? Assessing the Impact of Large Language Models on Computer Science Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education.
2. Denny, P., Prather, J., Leinonen, J., & Hellas, A. (2024). Computing Education in the Era of Generative AI: A Systematic Review of Pedagogical Opportunities and Threat Vectors. IEEE Transactions on Education.
3. MacNeil, S., et al. (2022). Experiences with Generating Code Explanations Using Micro-lessons and Large Language Models. Proceedings of the Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education.
4. Prather, J., et al. (2023). It's Weird That It Knows What I'm Thinking: Embedded AI Code Assistants and the Student Developer Experience. ACM SIGCSE International Computing Education Research Conference.
5. Savelka, J., et al. (2023). Large Language Models in Software Engineering Education: A Systematic Mapping Study. Journal of Systems and Software.
6. Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
7. Lo, C. K.. (2023). What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410.
8. Tlili, A., et al. (2023). What If the Devil Is My Guardian Angel: ChatGPT as a Case Study of Using AI in Higher Education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15.
9. Zawacki-Richter, O., et al. (2019). Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education—Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.
10. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A.., & Shipway, J. R.. (2023). Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International.
11. Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2023). So What If ChatGPT Wrote It? Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
12. OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv:2303.08774.
13. Bubeck, S., et al. (2023). Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4. arXiv:2303.12712.
14. Khalil, M., & Er, E.. (2023). Will ChatGPT Get You Caught? Rethinking Assessment and Academic Integrity in the Age of Generative AI. Journal of Learning Analytics.
15. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris: UNESCO.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Skolastika Maya Nio, Nova Nova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















