The Relationship between Vocabulary Mastery and Reading Comprehension of English Education Students at UNUSA

Mita Dewi Mukarromah; Tiyas Saputri

doi:10.31004/riggs.v5i2.10437

Authors

Mita Dewi Mukarromah Universitas Nahdhatul Ulama Surabaya
Tiyas Saputri Universitas Nahdhatul Ulama Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i2.10437

Keywords:

Vocabulary Mastery, Reading Comprehension, Correlation Study, English Education Student

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between vocabulary mastery and reading comprehension among English Education students at Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya (UNUSA). A quantitative correlational design was employed to determine whether students’ vocabulary knowledge was significantly associated with their ability to comprehend English texts. The population consisted of 40 students from the 2023 and 2024 cohorts. Using stratified random sampling and the Lemeshow formula, 28 students were selected as participants. Data were collected through a vocabulary mastery test and a reading comprehension test. The vocabulary test assessed word meanings, synonyms, antonyms, and contextual word use, while the reading test measured students’ ability to identify main ideas, supporting details, references, implied meanings, and vocabulary in context. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson Product Moment Correlation. The findings showed that the students obtained a mean vocabulary mastery score of 77, categorized as good, and a mean reading comprehension score of 74, categorized as moderate. The correlation analysis produced an r-value of 0.61 with a significance value of 0.000, indicating a strong, positive, and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. These findings suggest that students with broader vocabulary knowledge tend to comprehend English texts more effectively. Therefore, systematic vocabulary development should be integrated into reading instruction through contextual exercises, extensive reading, and independent learning activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bishry, H. (2018). The correlation between vocabulary mastery and reading comprehension. Jurnal Tarbawi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.32939/tarbawi.v14i2.292

2. Cook, V., & Smakman, D. (2026). Vocabulary. 252–281. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003497226-16

3. Ferreira, G., Heitor, & Yan, A. (2022). The importance of vocabulary in language learning. Innovations in Education, 1, 173–174. https://doi.org/10.47689/innovations-in-edu-vol-iss1-pp173-174

4. Harmon, J. M., & Wood, K. D. (2018). The vocabulary-comprehension relationship across the disciplines: Implications for instruction. Education Sciences, 8(3), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030101

5. He, X., & Deocampo, M. F. (2023). A theoretical review of vocabulary acquisition level and its influence on students’ reading comprehension. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 6(43), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.6(43).2023.389-398

6. Kurniawan, I. (2024). English language and its importance as global communication. International Journal of Social Science, 2(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.25078/ijoss.v2i1.3920

7. Mantra, N. (2022). Developing Indonesian as a foreign language learning methods. Deleted Journal, 7(11), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijefms-9112

8. Ofayani, D. (2024). The correlation between vocabulary mastery and reading comprehension among high school students. JEDLISH: Journal of English Language and Linguistics Studies, 4(2), 104–109.

9. Pebriawan, I. N. S. I., Hasan, B., & Sudirman. (2015). The correlation between vocabulary mastery and students’ reading comprehension. U-JET: Unila Journal of English Teaching, 4(6).

10. Putri, N. M., & Syahid, A. (n.d.). The correlation among EFL students’ self-efficacy, vocabulary mastery, and reading ability.

11. Ramadani, S., Saiful, & Azis, A. (2021). The correlation between students’ vocabulary mastery and reading comprehension. Journal of Language Testing and Assessment, 1(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.56983/jlta.v1i2.240

12. Ramya, R. (2024). The place of reading in the growth learning a language. Technoarete Transactions on Language and Linguistics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.36647/ttll/03.01.a001

13. Sarena, L. A., Anayati, W., & Suhendi, A. (2023). The correlation between students’ vocabulary and their descriptive reading comprehension. Journal of Language, 5(2), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.30743/jol.v5i2.7903

14. Schuth, E., Köhne, J., & Weinert, S. (2017). The influence of academic vocabulary knowledge on school performance. Learning and Instruction, 49, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.005

15. Siqueira, M. das G. A. (2023). The vocabulary is the basis of the language. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8114938