Perkembangan Pemikiran Ekonomi Marxis: Analisis Bibliometrik Menggunakan VOSviewer pada Database Dimensions

Septriani Theresia Siagian; Reisya Andini; Mutia Sugianto; Andina Febriana Lubis; Diaz Ayudis; Zahra Fadila; Joy Datista Siregar; Lucky Satria Pratama

doi:10.69693/ijmst.v5i1.14619

Authors

Septriani Theresia Siagian Univesitas Negeri Medan
Reisya Andini Universitas Negeri Medan
Mutia Sugianto Universitas Negeri Medan
Andina Febriana Lubis Universitas Negeri Medan
Diaz Ayudis Universitas Negeri Medan
Zahra Fadila Universitas Negeri Medan
Joy Datista Siregar Universitas Negeri Medan
Lucky Satria Pratama Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijmst.v5i1.14619

Keywords:

Marxism, Bibliometrik, Dimensions, VOSviewer, Kapitalisme

Abstract

Marxisme merupakan tradisi pemikiran kritis yang terus digunakan untuk menganalisis hubungan kekuasaan, kelas, dan kapitalisme. Karena risetnya tersebar lintas disiplin, literatur ini sulit dipahami hanya melalui tinjauan naratif. Penelitian ini bertujuan melacak literatur Marxisme tahun 2010–2026, mencakup perkembangan publikasi dan sitasi, penulis, negara, jurnal, serta struktur tematik berdasarkan ko-kemunculan kata kunci. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif deskriptif dengan analisis bibliometrik, yaitu analisis kinerja dan pemetaan sains. Data diambil dari database Dimensions pada 4 November 2026 dan mencakup 1.511 artikel dalam bidang ilmu politik, filsafat dan studi keagamaan, serta masyarakat manusia, dengan pemetaan menggunakan VOSviewer. Hasil menunjukkan total 10.824 sitasi, dengan rata-rata 7,16 dan median 1 sitasi per artikel; sebanyak 43,8% artikel belum pernah disitasi. Jumlah publikasi relatif stabil hingga 2016, kemudian meningkat hingga mencapai 178 artikel pada 2025. Amerika Serikat (189 artikel) dan Inggris (145 artikel) mendominasi, sedangkan Indonesia hanya menyumbang 14 artikel (sekitar 1,5%). Capital & Class memiliki total sitasi tertinggi, sementara Critique dan Historical Materialism memuat artikel terbanyak. Analisis 29 kata kunci menghasilkan tiga klaster: Marxisme Barat, hegemoni, dan sosialisme historis; ekonomi politik Marxis yang berfokus pada akumulasi, produksi, dan eksploitasi; serta akumulasi primitif, feminisme, gender, dan ras. Klaster Marxisme Barat serta klaster gender dan ras relatif lebih lemah, sehingga membuka peluang penelitian integratif. Keterbatasan studi ini adalah cakupannya yang hanya berupa artikel jurnal pada satu database, dan strategi pencarian turut memengaruhi kemunculan beberapa kata kunci.

References

1. Alami, I., Alves, C., Bonizzi, B., Kaltenbrunner, A., Koddenbrock, K., Kvangraven, I., & Powell, J. (2022). International financial subordination: a critical research agenda. Review of International Political Economy, 30(4), 1360–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2098359

2. Amin, S. (2015). Contemporary Imperialism. Monthly Review, 67(3), 23. https://doi.org/10.14452/mr-067-03-2015-07_2

3. Anderson, P. (1976). Considerations on Western Marxism. New Left Books.

4. Bhattacharya, T. (Ed.). (2017). Social reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering oppression. Pluto Press.

5. Birch, K. (2019). Technoscience Rent: Toward a Theory of Rentiership for Technoscientific Capitalism. Science Technology & Human Values, 45(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919829567

6. Bohrer, A. (2018). Intersectionality and Marxism: A Critical Historiography. Historical Materialism, 26(2), 46–74.

7. Dantzler, P. A. (2021). The urban process under racial capitalism: Race, anti-Blackness, and capital accumulation. Journal of Race Ethnicity and the City, 2(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/26884674.2021.1934201

8. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

9. Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.

10. Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the witch: Women, the body and primitive accumulation. Autonomedia.

11. Fine, B. (2013). Financialization from a Marxist Perspective. International Journal of Political Economy, 42(4), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.2753/ijp0891-1916420403

12. Fine, B. (2013). Financialization from a Marxist perspective. International Journal of Political Economy, 42(4), 47–66.

13. Fletcher, R. (2011). Sustaining Tourism, Sustaining Capitalism? The Tourism Industry's Role in Global Capitalist Expansion. Tourism Geographies, 13(3), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2011.570372

14. Fletcher, R. (2011). Sustaining tourism, sustaining capitalism? The tourism industry’s role in global capitalist expansion. Tourism Geographies, 13(3), 443–461.

15. Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s ecology: Materialism and nature. Monthly Review Press.

16. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers.

17. Gunder, M. (2010). Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space. Planning Theory, 9(4), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210368878

18. Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.

19. Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20. Hogan, B. (2015). Pragmatic Hegemony: Questions and Convergence. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 29(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.29.1.0107

21. Hook, D. W., Porter, S. J., & Herzog, C. (2018). Dimensions: Building context for search and evaluation. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00023

22. Jay, M. (1973). The dialectical imagination: A history of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950. Little, Brown.

23. Katz, C. (2011). Accumulation, excess, childhood: toward a countertopography of risk and waste. Documents d'Anàlisi Geogràfica, 57(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/dag.806

24. Lapavitsas, C. (2013). The financialization of capitalism: ‘Profiting without producing’. City, 17(6), 792–805.

25. Lapavitsas, C. (2013). The financialization of capitalism: 'Profiting without producing'. City, 17(6), 792–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2013.853865

26. Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Sementara. (1966). Ketetapan MPRS Nomor XXV/MPRS/1966 tentang pembubaran Partai Komunis Indonesia, pernyataan sebagai organisasi terlarang di seluruh wilayah negara Republik Indonesia bagi Partai Komunis Indonesia dan larangan setiap kegiatan untuk menyebarkan atau mengembangkan faham atau ajaran Komunisme/Marxisme-Leninisme.

27. Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1; B. Fowkes, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1867)

28. Robinson, C. J. (1983). Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition. London: Zed Press.

29. Robinson, C. J. (1983). Black Marxism: The making of the black radical tradition. Zed Press.

30. Slater, T. (2013). Your Life Chances Affect Where You Live: A Critique of the 'Cottage Industry' of Neighbourhood Effects Research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2013.01215.x

31. Todorova, M. S. (2018). Race and Women of Color in Socialist/Postsocialist Transnational Feminisms in Central and Southeastern Europe. Meridians, 16(1), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.2979/meridians.16.1.11

32. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.

33. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

34. Virdee, S. (2019). Racialized capitalism: An account of its contested origins and consolidation. The Sociological Review, 67(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118820293

35. Virdee, S. (2019). Racialized capitalism: An account of its contested origins and consolidation. The Sociological Review, 67(1), 3–27.

36. Wilson, K. (2015). Towards a Radical Re‐appropriation: Gender, Development and Neoliberal Feminism. Development and Change, 46(4), 803–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12176

37. Yan, X. (2018). Chinese Values vs. Liberalism: What Ideology Will Shape the International Normative Order? The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poy001