Stare and Gaze: Nonverbal Signs of Courtship in The White Olive Tree and Descendants of the Sun
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69693/ijmst.v4i3.14028Keywords:
Nonverbal Sign, Courtship, The White Olive Tree, Descendants of the SunAbstract
This study examines the use of nonverbal signs in courtship behavior portrayed in two Asian romance dramas, The White Olive Tree (2025) and Descendants of the Sun (2016). The study aims to identify the courtship phases in which nonverbal courtship signs appear and to analyze the forms of nonverbal signs represented through facial expressions and gestures in both dramas. This study employs a qualitative descriptive approach. The data consist of selected scenes from the two dramas that depict nonverbal interactions between the main characters, particularly scenes showing emotional closeness and romantic attraction. Data were collected by observing selected episodes and scenes from official streaming sources on iQIYI and were systematically categorized into a coding sheet. The data were analyzed using Spradley’s (1980) four stages of analysis: domain, taxonomy, componential analysis, and cultural themes, with Givens’ (1978) theory of nonverbal courtship behavior as the main analytical framework. The findings show that both dramas portray five courtship phases: the attention phase, recognition phase, interaction phase, sexual arousal phase, and resolution phase. The nonverbal signs include eye contact, facial expressions, smiles, gaze aversion, body movements, self-grooming, hand-holding, touching, and embracing. These signs function to express attraction, affection, emotional support, and intimacy. The study concludes that nonverbal communication plays an important role in developing emotional closeness and romantic relationships and that Givens’ theory can be applied to analyze courtship behavior in visual media.
References
1. Bakar, N. D. A., Ibrahim, N. Z. M., & Alias, N. Z. I. (2025). The Impact of Non-Verbal Communication in Romantic Relationship Among Married Couple. International Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 1(1), 33-41.
2. Croes, E., Antheunis, M., Schouten, A., & Krahmer, E. (2018). The role of eye-contact in the development of romantic attraction: Studying interactive uncertainty reduction strategies during speed-dating. Comput. Hum. Behav., 105, 106218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106218.
3. Darwin, C. (1872). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. John Murray.
4. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1971). Love and Hate: The Natural History of Behavior Patterns. Methuen.
5. Givens, D. B. (1978). The nonverbal basis of attraction: Flirtation, courtship, and seduction. Psychiatry, 41(4), 346-357.
6. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books.
7. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Anchor Books.
8. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.
9. Hall, J. A., Xing, C., & Brooks, S. (2015). The verbal and nonverbal correlates of the five flirting styles. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39(1), 41–68.
10. Hoffmann, A., Schiestl, S., Sinske, P., Gondan, M., Sachse, P., & Maran, T. (2024). Sharing and Receiving Eye-Contact Predicts Mate Choice After a 5-Minute Conversation: Evidence from a Speed-Dating Study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 53, 959 - 968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02806-0.
11. Harrison, C. (2003). Visual social semiotics: Understanding how still images make meaning. Technical Communication, 50(1), 46-60.
12. Hodgins, H. S., & Zuckerman, M. (1990). The effect of nonverbal sensitivity on social interaction. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14(2), 155–170.
13. Kamal, N. M., & Afandi, W. N. H. W. (2025). CONFLICTS IN NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION BETWEEN ROMANTIC PARTNERS: A CONCEPT PAPER ON AN EXPLORATORY STUDY IN URBAN AREAS. Asian People Journal (APJ), 8(SI1), 1-14.
14. Kotlyar, I., & Ariely, D. (2013). The effect of nonverbal cues on relationship formation. Comput. Hum. Behav., 29, 544-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.020.
15. Manap, S., & Michelle, K. O. (2023, March). Nonverbal communication as a symbol of love in long distance relationships (LDR). In Proceeding of International Conference on Business, Economics, Social Sciences, and Humanities (Vol. 6, pp. 575-583).
16. Moore, M. M. (2010). Human nonverbal courtship: Review of past research and tips for future work. Human Ethology Bulletin, 25(3), 3-30.
17. Nurhidayanto. (2024). Incongruity and Disparagement Humor in Mr. Bean’s Nonverbal Language. Leksema: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(1), 33–41.
18. Pfaus, J. G., Safron, A., & Zakreski, E. (2023). From distal to proximal to interactive: behavioral and brain synchrony during attraction, courtship, and sexual interaction—implications for clinical assessments of relationship style and quality. Sexual Medicine Reviews, 11(4), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qead034.
19. Pink, S. (2013). Doing Visual Ethnography. Sage Publications.
20. Romaniuk, O. (2022). EXPRESSION AND INTERPRETATION OF ATTRACTION AND INTERPERSONAL INTIMACY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FEMALE NONVERBAL BEHAVIOUR. Annals of the University of Craiova. Series Philology. Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.52846/aucssflingv.v43i1.18.
21. Rusu, M. S. (2018). Theorising love in sociological thought: Classical contributions to a sociology of love. Sociology, 52(3), 493–509.
22. Zillmann, D. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 199–231). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary on Social and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.














