Kesenjangan Pemanfaatan dan Pemaknaan SIGHAP: Studi Fenomenologi Deskriptif Karyawan Perusahaan Manufaktur Semen

Andik Sutikno; Gatot Kustyadji; Grandys Frieska Prassida

doi:10.69693/ijmst.v4i3.13968

Authors

Andik Sutikno Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia
Gatot Kustyadji Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia
Grandys Frieska Prassida Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijmst.v4i3.13968

Keywords:

Pemanfaatan SIGHAP, Pemaknaan SIGHAP, Fenomenologi Deskriptif, Karyawan, Perusahaan Manufaktur Semen

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan memahami bagaimana karyawan mengalami dan memaknai pemanfaatan aplikasi kesehatan digital SIGHAP dalam konteks dukungan kesehatan kerja pada sebuah perusahaan manufaktur semen. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode fenomenologi deskriptif dan analisis Colaizzi. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam terhadap dua belas karyawan yang memiliki pengalaman langsung menggunakan SIGHAP, yaitu Informan 101–112. Analisis dilakukan melalui identifikasi pernyataan signifikan, unit makna, open/In Vivo coding, pengelompokan kategori dan tema, perumusan makna, deskripsi menyeluruh, serta struktur esensial. Hasil penelitian menghasilkan enam tema utama: SIGHAP sebagai media akses dan pemantauan kesehatan digital; medium pembentukan kesadaran dan pengelolaan diri; pengalaman perhatian organisasi; feedback dan tindak lanjut sebagai mekanisme pembentuk kebermaknaan; ruang suara karyawan; serta proses sosial dan digital. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa kebermaknaan SIGHAP tidak ditentukan oleh ketersediaan dan kemudahan teknologi saja. Karyawan memaknai aplikasi melalui kemampuan memahami kondisi diri, merasakan perhatian organisasi, mengetahui tujuan dan hasil asesmen, serta memperoleh umpan balik dan tindak lanjut. Integrasi Social Exchange Theory, Personal Engagement Theory, dan Sensemaking menunjukkan bahwa feedback dan tindak lanjut menjadi titik temu antara relasi karyawan-organisasi, keterlibatan personal, dan proses pembentukan makna. Dengan demikian, SIGHAP menjadi lebih bermakna ketika data kesehatan berubah menjadi pengetahuan bagi karyawan dan menjadi dasar respons atau tindakan yang relevan.

References

[1] Stratton, E., Jones, N., Peters, S. E., Torous, J., & Glozier, N., “Digital mHealth interventions for employees: Systematic review and meta-analysis of their effects on workplace outcomes,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(8), e512–e525, 2021. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002267.

[2] Moe-Byrne, T., Shepherd, J., Merecz-Kot, D., Sinokki, M., Naumanen, P., Hakkaart-van Roijen, L., & Van Der Feltz-Cornelis, C., “Effectiveness of tailored digital health interventions for mental health at the workplace: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials,” PLOS Digital Health, 1(10), e0000123, 2022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000123.

[3] Kechagias, E. P., Papadopoulos, G. A., & Rokai, I., “Evaluating the impact of digital health interventions on workplace health outcomes: A systematic review,” Administrative Sciences, 14(6), 131, 2024. doi: 10.3390/admsci14060131.

[4] Nöhammer, E., & Drexel, M., “The potentials of digital workplace health promotion,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(7), 902, 2024. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070902.

[5] Amirabdolahian, S., Pare, G., & Tams, S., “Digital wellness programs in the workplace: Meta-review,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e70982, 2025. doi: 10.2196/70982.

[6] Pinhatti, E. D. G., Machado, R. C. B. R., Pimenta, R. A., Jaques, A. E., & Haddad, M. C. F. L., “Promoting mental health in the workplace: Web software development and validation,” Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 32, e4353, 2024. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.7181.4353.

[7] Parés-Salomón, I., Señé-Mir, A. M., Martín-Bozas, F., Loef, B., Coffey, A., Dowd, K. P., Jabardo-Cambrubí, G., Proper, K. I., Puig-Ribera, A., & Bort-Roig, J., “Effectiveness of workplace interventions with digital elements to reduce sedentary behaviours in office employees: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 21, 41, 2024. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01595-6.

[8] Junker, M., Dünnebeil, S., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H., “Usage of a workplace health promotion app: An evaluation of app usage data and medical check-up results,” Health Informatics Journal, 29(1), 2023. doi: 10.1177/14604582221148058.

[9] Junker, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H., “Advantages and disadvantages of mobile applications for workplace health promotion: A scoping review,” PLOS ONE, 19(1), e0296212, 2024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296212.

[10] Sevic, A., Hashemi, N. S., Thørrisen, M. M., Strømstad, K., Skarpaas, L. S., Storm, M., & Brønnick, K. K., “Effectiveness of eHealth interventions targeting employee health behaviors: Systematic review,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e38307, 2023. doi: 10.2196/38307.

[11] De Angelis, M., Volpi, L., Giusino, D., Pietrantoni, L., & Fraboni, F., “Acceptability and usability of a digital platform promoting mental health at work: A qualitative evaluation,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1246–1259, 2025. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2024.2313892.

[12] Yoon, S., Goh, H., Low, X. C., Weng, J. H., & Heaukulani, C., “User perceptions and utilisation of features of an AI-enabled workplace digital mental wellness platform ‘mindline at work’,” BMJ Health & Care Informatics, 31(1), e101045, 2024. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101045.

[13] Cameron, G., Mulvenna, M., Ennis, E., O’Neill, S., Bond, R., Cameron, D., & Bunting, A., “Effectiveness of digital mental health interventions in the workplace: Umbrella review of systematic reviews,” JMIR Mental Health, 12, e67785, 2025. doi: 10.2196/67785.

[14] Stratton, E., Morris, R. W., Milton, A., Deady, M., Choi, I., & Glozier, N., “Optimizing workplace digital mental health interventions: Systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e71253, 2025. doi: 10.2196/71253.

[15] Aizawa, T., Okudaira, H., Kitagawa, R., Kuroda, S., & Owan, H., “Employee well-being in the digital age: Assessing the impacts of a smartphone application in the workplace,” Economics and Human Biology, 55, 101445, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101445.

[16] May, N., Kasten, S., Schwan, T., Scharle, M., Tautz, A., Letzel, S., & Dietz, P., “The effect of an app-based health intervention on somatic symptoms among employees of the DHL Group: A longitudinal pilot study,” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 98(6), 549–572, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s00420-025-02145-8.

[17] Alkhayyal, S., & Bajaba, S., “Countering technostress in virtual work environments: The role of work-based learning and digital leadership in enhancing employee well-being,” Acta Psychologica, 248, 104377, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104377.

[18] Rick, V. B., Stebner, M., Dräger, L., Franken, A., Mertens, A., & Nitsch, V., “Effects of AI-based technologies on employees’ work engagement: Implications for the human-centered design of digital work,” Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 78, 323–334, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s41449-024-00438-1.

[19] Han, Z., Song, G., Zhang, Y., & Yan, L., “Enhancing employees’ workplace well-being through workplace digitization: Exploring the mediating roles of job demands and digital anxiety,” Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1642489, 2025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1642489.

[20] Anwar, R., & Yuniasanti, R., “Hubungan antara perceived organizational support dengan employee engagement pada karyawan,” PSIKOSAINS, 19(1), 1–11, 2024. doi: 10.30587/psikosains.v19i1.6302.

[21] Cilesiz, S., “A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: Current state, promise, and future directions for research,” Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 487–510, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2.

[22] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N., “Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches,” SAGE Publications, 4th ed.

[23] Colaizzi, P. F., “Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it,” Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology, pp. 48–71. Oxford University Press.

[24] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G., “Naturalistic inquiry,” SAGE Publications

[25] Kahn, W. A., “Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work,” Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724, 1990. doi: 10.2307/256287.

[26] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S., “Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review,” Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900, 2005. doi: 10.1177/0149206305279602.

[27] Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D., “Perceived organizational support,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507, 1986. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500.

[28] Weick, K. E., “Sensemaking in organizations,” SAGE Publications

[29] Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M., “Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward,” The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125, 2014. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2014.873177.

[30] Zulu, S. L., & Saad, A. M., “Sensemaking and digital transformation in construction organisations,” Construction Innovation, 23(5), 1028–1046, 2023. doi: 10.1108/CI-11-2021-0211.