Strategi Transformasi Green Supply Chain Management melalui Praktik Circular Economy dalam Membangun Keberlanjutan Agribisnis Peternakan Domba: Studi Kasus Kualitatif pada Wedhusqu Farm Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69693/ijmst.v4i3.12640Keywords:
Green Supply Chain Management, Circular Economy, Green Entrepreneurship, Agribisnis Peternakan DombaAbstract
Transformasi keberlanjutan pada sektor agribisnis peternakan menghadapi tantangan dalam mengintegrasikan praktik rantai pasok hijau dengan prinsip ekonomi sirkular untuk mengkreasikan nilai ekonomi, lingkungan, dan sosial berkelanjutan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi strategi transformasi Green Supply Chain Management melalui praktik Circular Economy dalam membangun keberlanjutan agribisnis peternakan domba pada Wedhusqu Farm Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam terhadap pemilik usaha, pengelola operasional, pekerja peternakan, pemasok, dan mitra pengolahan hasil samping peternakan, dan didukung oleh observasi lapangan dan dokumentasi perusahaan. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan perangkat lunak NVivo 15 melalui tahapan coding, kategorisasi tema, analisis hubungan antar konsep, dan visualisasi jaringan tematik. Hasil simulasi analisis menunjukkan bahwa strategi keberlanjutan Wedhusqu Farm terbentuk melalui lima tema utama, yaitu pengadaan hijau, efisiensi penggunaan sumber daya, pengelolaan limbah berbasis sirkular, inovasi proses agribisnis, dan kolaborasi rantai pasok. Praktik ekonomi sirkular berperan sebagai mekanisme transformasi yang mengubah limbah peternakan menjadi sumber daya bernilai tambah melalui pemanfaatan kembali bahan organik, optimalisasi pakan, dan pengembangan hubungan kemitraan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa keberhasilan transformasi rantai pasok hijau pada agribisnis peternakan domba dipengaruhi oleh kemampuan kewirausahaan hijau dalam mengintegrasikan inovasi lingkungan, orientasi keberlanjutan, dan strategi bisnis adaptif. Temuan penelitian memberikan implikasi bagi pengembangan model keberlanjutan agribisnis berbasis ekonomi sirkular pada sektor peternakan lokal.
References
Abdallah, A. B., Al-Ghwayeen, W. S., Al-Amayreh, E. M., & Sweis, R. J. (2024). The impact of green supply chain management on circular economy performance: The mediating roles of green innovations. Logistics, 8(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8010020
Abobakr, M. A., Abdel-Kader, M. G., & Elbayoumi, A. F. (2022). The impact of lean manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: A natural resource-based view. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 18(3), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2022.03.002
Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Baah, C., Afum, E., & Kumi, C. A. (2023). Circular supply chain practices and corporate sustainability performance: Do ethical supply chain leadership and environmental orientation make a difference? Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2022-0296
Ahmad, A., Ikram, A., Rehan, M. F., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Going green: Impact of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 973676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.973676
Ahmad, I., Abdullah, A., et al. (2025). The mediating role of green accounting management on financial performance: Integrated stakeholder theory and natural resource-based view. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 15(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.18135
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. . (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods, 5th Edition. Pearson.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Sage.
Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C. and Gronhaug, K. (2001), Qualitative Marketing Research, Sage, London.
Charmaz, K. and Belgrave, L.L. (2018), “Thinking about data with grounded theory”, Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 25 No. 8, pp. 743-753, doi: 10.1177/1077800418809455
Chassang, L., Hsieh, C.-J., Li, T.-N., & Hsieh, C.-M. (2024). Feasibility assessment of stakeholder benefits in community-based agritourism through university social responsibility practices. Agriculture, 14(4), Article 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040602
Coppola, C., Vollero, A., & Siano, A. (2023). Developing dynamic capabilities for the circular economy in the textile and clothing industry in Italy: A natural-resource-based view. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4798–4820. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3394
Christou, P. A. (2023). How to use artificial intelligence (AI) as a resource, methodological and analysis tool in qualitative research? The Qualitative Report, 28(7), 1968–1980. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008), Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., Sage, London.
Corbin, J.M. and Strauss, A.L. (2015), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th ed., SAGE, Los Angeles
Davidaviciene, V., Diab, B., & Al Majzoub, M. (2026). Effects of circular economy principles, technological integration, and sustainable supply chain management practices on green supply chain and organizational performance. Logistics, 10(4), 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics10040093
Farrukh, A., & Sajjad, M. (2026). A natural resource-based view of circular economy practices in the pharmaceutical industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(3), 4587–4605. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70413.
Farrukh, A., Mathrani, S., & Sajjad, A. (2024). A comparative analysis of green-lean-six sigma enablers and environmental outcomes: A natural resource-based view. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 15(3), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-05-2021-0095
Gabler, C. B., Itani, O. S., & Agnihotri, R. (2023). Activating corporate environmental ethics on the frontline: A natural resource-based view. Journal of Business Ethics, 186, 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05201-2.
Khan, S. A. R., Umar, M., Asadov, A., Tanveer, M., & Yu, Z. (2022). Technological revolution and circular economy practices: A mechanism of green economy. Sustainability, 14(8), 4524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084524
Kotliarov, I. D. (2022). Heterogeneity of stakeholders as an obstacle to the development of agricultural cooperatives in Russia. Russian Peasant Studies, 7(4), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2022-7-4-20-32
Kovalova, M., Valentinov, V., & Gagalyuk, T. (2025). Societal value creation through digital technologies: Insights from stakeholder collaborations of Ukrainian agroholdings. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 28(3), 580–598. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr.1277
Lau, C. C. I., & Wong, C. W. Y. (2024). Achieving sustainable development with sustainable packaging: A natural-resource-based view perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4766–4787. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3720.
Liute, A., & De Giacomo, M. R. (2022). The environmental performance of UK-based B Corp companies: An analysis based on the triple bottom line approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 810–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2919
Lu, H., Zhao, G., & Liu, S. (2024). Integrating circular economy and Industry 4.0 for sustainable supply chain management: A dynamic capability view. Production Planning & Control, 35(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287. 2022.2063198.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Sage Publication.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. B. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (3rd ed.). Sage Publication, Inc.
Moleong. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Olsen, W. (2004). Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really be Mixed. Causeway Press.
O’Neill, M. M., Booth, S. R., & Lamb, J. T. (2018). Using NVivoTM for Literature Reviews: The Eight Step Pedagogy (N7+1). The Qualitative Report, 23(13), 21 39.
Makhloufi, L., Laghouag, A. A., Meirun, T., & Belaid, F. (2022). Impact of green entrepreneurship orientation on environmental performance: The natural resource-based view and environmental policy perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2902.
Marschner, S., Orsi, L., Olper, A., & Stranieri, S. (2026). Sustainability strategies in the cocoa-chocolate value chain: An analysis using stakeholder theory, global value chain theory, and resource dependence theory. Agribusiness, 42, 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.22044
Nogueira, E., Gomes, S., & Lopes, J. M. (2022). The key to sustainable economic development: A triple bottom line approach. Resources, 11(5), Article 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11050046
Nogueira, E., Gomes, S., & Lopes, J. M. (2023). Triple bottom line, sustainability, and economic development: What binds them together? A bibliometric approach. Sustainability, 15(8), Article 6706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086706
Nogueira, E., Gomes, S., & Lopes, J. M. (2024). Financial sustainability: Exploring the influence of the triple bottom line economic dimension on firm performance. Sustainability, 16(15), Article 6458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156458
Nogueira, E., Gomes, S., & Lopes, J. M. (2025). Unveiling triple bottom line's influence on business performance. Discover Sustainability, 6, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00804-x
Rodríguez-González, R. M., Maldonado-Guzmán, G., Madrid-Guijarro, A., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2022). Does circular economy affect financial performance? The mediating role of sustainable supply chain management in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379 (Part 1), 134670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134670
Sabino, A., Moreira, A., Cesário, F., & Coelho, M. P. (2024). Measuring sustainability: A validation study of a triple bottom line (TBL) scale in Portugal. Emerging Science Journal, 8(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-03-06
Saha, K., Yarnall, M., & Paladini, S. (2024). Sustainable practices in the animal health industry: A stakeholder-based view. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 3356–3382. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3633.
Satar, M. S. (2022). Sustainability and triple bottom line planning in social enterprises: Developing the guidelines for social entrepreneurs. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(3), 813–821. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170311
Schillings, J., Bennett, R., & Rose, D. C. (2023). Perceptions of farming stakeholders towards automating dairy cattle mobility and body condition scoring in farm assurance schemes. Animal, 17(5), Article 100786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100786.
Sehnem, S., Bispo, D. S., João, J. O., de Souza, M. A. L., Bertoglio, O., Ciotti, R., & Deon, S. M. (2022). Upscaling circular economy in foodtechs businesses in emergent countries: Towards sustainable development through natural resource based view. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 1200–1221. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2311.
Senyo, P. K., & Osabutey, E. L. C. (2023). Transdisciplinary perspective on sustainable multi-tier supply chains: A triple bottom line inspired framework and future research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 61(14), 4918–4933. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1946194
Siahaan, J. R., Pagalung, G., Demmallino, E. B., Saleng, A., Sulaiman, A. A., & Nagu, N. (2025). A triple-bottom-line performance measurement model for the sustainability of post-mining landscapes in Indonesia. Sustainability, 17(13), Article 6218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136218.
Taylor, K. M., & Rosca, E. (2024). Toward a moral approach to stakeholder management: Insights from the inclusion of marginalized stakeholders in the operations of social enterprises. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(10), 1831–1858. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2022-0549
Theeraworawit, M., Suriyankietkaew, S., & Hallinger, P. (2022). Sustainable supply chain management in a circular economy: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 14(15), 9304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159304
Valentinov, V., Imami, D., & Xhoxhi, O. (2024). Contract farming in transitional economies: A stakeholder theory perspective. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 27(4), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr1099
Wang, X., Kim, J., Kim, J., & Koh, Y. (2024). Application of natural-resource-based view to nature-based tourism destinations. Sustainability, 16(6), Article 2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062375.
Yagi, H., Tanaka, K., Fujii, Y., & Inoue, N. (2024). Stakeholder management and organizational form of arable farms: A comparison of paddy farm corporations in Japan. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 27(4), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2022.0005.
Zahran, S. (2024). Investigating the nexus between green supply chain practices and sustainable waste management in advancing circular economy. Sustainability, 16(9), 3566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093566
Zhou, B., Siddik, A. B., Zheng, G.-W., & Masukujjaman, M. (2023). Unveiling the role of green logistics management in improving SMEs’ sustainability performance: Do circular economy practices and supply chain traceability matter? Systems, 11(4), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11040198ne
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary on Social and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.














