Model Konseptual Logistik Sirkular untuk Pemanfaatan Kembali Limbah Kulit Singkong Arkanci Group

Gilbert hutauruk; Wenny Ananda Larasati; Ma'ruf Efendi

doi:10.69693/ijmst.v4i3.12618

Authors

Gilbert hutauruk Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Wenny Ananda Larasati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Ma'ruf Efendi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/ijmst.v4i3.12618

Keywords:

limbah kulit singkong, logistik sirkular, model konseptual, pemanfaatan kembali,, reverse flow

Abstract

Limbah kulit singkong dari aktivitas pengolahan pangan skala mikro di pasar tradisional umumnya masih mengikuti pola linear kumpul–angkut–buang, meskipun material tersebut masih dapat diarahkan menuju pemanfaatan kembali. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi kondisi eksisting pengelolaan limbah kulit singkong, menganalisis alur pengelolaan dan posisi reverse flow, serta menyusun model konseptual logistik sirkular pada Arkanci Group di area luar Pasar Rau Kota Serang. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan metode studi kasus. Data diperoleh melalui observasi lapangan, wawancara semi-terstruktur, dokumentasi, studi literatur, dan konfirmasi lanjutan, kemudian diperiksa melalui triangulasi sumber dan triangulasi teknik. Analisis menggunakan lima dimensi circular logistics, yaitu stakeholder integration, reverse flow of waste, value recovery process, circular utilization, serta supporting factors and constraints. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sekitar 10–15 kg limbah kulit singkong dihasilkan setiap hari dari pengupasan sekitar 50 kg singkong untuk produksi singkong parut. Pengelolaan eksisting masih didominasi alur pembuangan umum, sedangkan reverse flow informal terindikasi melalui pengambilan sesekali oleh peternak. Model konseptual mengarahkan material melalui pemisahan sejak sumber, pengumpulan terpisah, penyimpanan sementara dan konsolidasi, serta Penentuan Jalur Pemanfaatan secara konseptual. Material selanjutnya dapat diarahkan pada pemanfaatan langsung, pemulihan nilai melalui pengolahan lanjutan, atau jalur residu. Arah akhir model adalah pemanfaatan kembali secara open-loop oleh aktor relevan di luar Arkanci Group. Briket biomassa hanya menjadi contoh opsi pengolahan lanjutan dan tidak diuji secara teknis dalam penelitian ini.

Kata kunci: limbah kulit singkong, logistik sirkular, model konseptual, pemanfaatan kembali, reverse flow

References

Ada, N., Kazancoglu, Y., Sezer, M. D., Ede-Senturk, C., Ozer, I., & Ram, M. (2021). Analyzing barriers of circular food supply chains and proposing Industry 4.0 solutions. Sustainability, 13(12), 6812. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126812

Alarcón, F., Cortés-Pellicer, P., Pérez-Perales, D., & Mengual-Recuerda, A. (2021). A reference model of reverse logistics process for improving sustainability in the supply chain. Sustainability, 13(18), 10383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810383

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Duca, D., & Toscano, G. (2022). Biomass energy resources: Feedstock quality and bioenergy sustainability. Resources, 11(6), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11060057

Febrianti, N., Maharani, S., & Hudayarizka, R. (2025). Biomass potential of cassava peels and wastewater sludge from the Somber Small Industry Center (SIKS) as briquettes. SPECTA Journal of Technology, 9(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.35718/specta.v9i1.1185

Hall, S., & Liebenberg, L. (2024). Qualitative description as an introductory method to qualitative research for master’s-level students and research trainees. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241242264

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Jamaludin, D., Mulyati, H., & Slamet, A. S. (2022). Strategi optimasi jaringan distribusi sampah organik di Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi, 13(4), 371-383. https://doi.org/10.29244/jmo.v13i4.33208

Kazancoglu, Y., Kazancoglu, I., & Sagnak, M. (2021). Circular logistics and reverse supply chain sustainability. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 269-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.009

Mallick, P. K., Salling, K. B., Pigosso, D. C. A., & McAloone, T. C. (2023). Closing the loop: Establishing reverse logistics for a circular economy, a systematic review. Journal of Environmental Management, 328, 117017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117017

Marreiro, H. M. P., Peruchi, R. S., Lopes, R. M. B. P., Andersen, S. L. F., Eliziario, S. A., & Rotella Junior, P. (2021). Empirical studies on biomass briquette production: A literature review. Energies, 14(24), 8320. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248320

Mayr, H. C., & Thalheim, B. (2021). The triptych of conceptual modeling: A framework for a better understanding of conceptual modeling. Software and Systems Modeling, 20, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-020-00836-z

McKim, C. (2023). Meaningful member-checking: A structured approach to member-checking. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(2), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12973

Nair, L. G., Agrawal, K., & Verma, P. (2022). An overview of sustainable approaches for bioenergy production from agro-industrial wastes. Energy Nexus, 6, 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100086

Nunes, L. J. R. (2025). Reverse logistics as a catalyst for decarbonizing forest products supply chains. Logistics, 9(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9010017

Paparini, S., Papoutsi, C., Murdoch, J., & Green, J. (2021). Evaluating complex interventions in context: Systematic, meta-narrative review of case study approaches. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21, 225. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01418-3

Ripanti, E., & Tjahjono, B. (2019). Unveiling the potentials of circular economy values in logistics and supply chain management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(3), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2018-0109

Salimah, S. F., Akhmad, S., & Arendra, A. (2025). Characteristics and energy potential of bio-briquettes from cassava peel, water hyacinth, and sawdust. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia, 5(6), 1513-1517. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.439

Shaharudin, M. R., Mohamad Mokhtar, A. R., Wararatchai, P., & Legino, R. (2022). Circular supply chain management and circular economy: A conceptual model. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI7), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI7.3762

Sulistyowati, L., Pangaribuan, N., Idrus, O., & Rachman, A. (2023). Utilization of cassava peel waste as an organic fertilizer to build a sustainable cassava production center. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan, 13(4), 528-537. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.13.4.528-537

United Nations Environment Programme, & International Solid Waste Association. (2024). Global Waste Management Outlook 2024: Beyond an age of waste - Turning rubbish into a resource. United Nations Environment Programme. https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/44939

Vargas-Merino, J. A., Rios-Lama, C. A., & Panez-Bendezu, M. H. (2022). Circular economy: Approaches and perspectives of a variable with a growing trend in the scientific world - A systematic review of the last 5 years. Sustainability, 14(22), 14682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214682

Vogiantzi, C., & Tserpes, K. (2023). On the definition, assessment, and enhancement of circular economy across various industrial sectors: A literature review and recent findings. Sustainability, 15(23), 16532. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316532